Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 18;22(1):e3002469.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3002469. eCollection 2024 Jan.

Unveiling recent and ongoing adaptive selection in human populations

Affiliations

Unveiling recent and ongoing adaptive selection in human populations

Ziyue Gao. PLoS Biol. .

Abstract

Genome-wide scans for signals of selection have become a routine part of the analysis of population genomic variation datasets and have resulted in compelling evidence of selection during recent human evolution. This Essay spotlights methodological innovations that have enabled the detection of selection over very recent timescales, even in contemporary human populations. By harnessing large-scale genomic and phenotypic datasets, these new methods use different strategies to uncover connections between genotype, phenotype, and fitness. This Essay outlines the rationale and key findings of each strategy, discusses challenges in interpretation, and describes opportunities to improve detection and understanding of ongoing selection in human populations.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Overall framework of selection bridging population genetics and quantitative genetics models.
In this conceptual framework, selection on genotype is mediated by fitness-relevant phenotype and manifests in allele frequency changes and genetic variation patterns. In any specific environment, genotype and environment together shape the phenotype of an individual, which in turn determines the fitness. In addition to its direct effect on the phenotype (solid purple arrow), the environment also modifies the genotype-to-phenotype mapping (i.e., genotype-by-environment interaction; indicated by the dotted purple arrow) and phenotype-to-fitness mapping (dashed purple arrow). Through interactions with other evolutionary forces (indicated by the brown plus sign), natural selection shapes the allele frequency trajectory over time and leaves footprints in genomic variation in present-day populations.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Signals of recent positive selection in genetic variation and corresponding methods for selection inference.
(A) The hallmark of positive selection is faster allele frequency increase than would be expected under neutrality. (B) The rapid allele frequency change leaves footprints in the surrounding genomic region, although the specific patterns depend on the strength, tempo, and mode of selection (e.g., selection on standing variation versus on de novo variants). (C) Major methods for detecting positive selection based on present-day genetic variation.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Common strategies for detecting signatures of recent or ongoing selection.
(A) A “genotype-focused” strategy focuses on the cumulative effects of historical selection on genetic variation patterns and relies on population genetics modeling to tease apart the influence of other evolutionary forces. Ancient DNA data provide direct information on allele frequency changes, which helps reduce inference uncertainty and confounding by demographic history. (B) A “fitness-focused” strategy focuses on direct association between genotype and fitness component(s) and utilizes allele frequency changes within one generation to detect selection in contemporary populations. As a special case of this strategy, between-sex differences in adult allele frequency or effect size of association to fitness components can be leveraged to detect sex-differential selection. (C) A “phenotype-focused” strategy relies on aggregation of selection signals revealed by genotype-focused or fitness-focused strategies across trait-associated variants identified by genome-wide association studies (GWAS).

References

    1. Voight BF, Kudaravalli S, Wen X, Pritchard JK. A map of recent positive selection in the human genome. PLoS Biol. 2006;4(3):e72. Epub 20060307. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040072 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1382018. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mostafavi H, Berisa T, Day FR, Perry JRB, Przeworski M, Pickrell JK. Identifying genetic variants that affect viability in large cohorts. PLoS Biol. 2017;15(9):e2002458. Epub 20170905. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2002458 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5584811. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Simons YB, Bullaughey K, Hudson RR, Sella G. A population genetic interpretation of GWAS findings for human quantitative traits. PLoS Biol. 2018;16(3):e2002985. Epub 20180316. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2002985 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5871013. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ruzicka F, Holman L, Connallon T. Polygenic signals of sex differences in selection in humans from the UK Biobank. PLoS Biol. 2022;20(9):e3001768. Epub 20220906. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001768 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC9481184. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cassa CA, Weghorn D, Balick DJ, Jordan DM, Nusinow D, Samocha KE, et al.. Estimating the selective effects of heterozygous protein-truncating variants from human exome data. Nat Genet. 2017;49(5):806–10. Epub 20170403. doi: 10.1038/ng.3831 ; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5618255. - DOI - PMC - PubMed