Permanent Contraception: Ethical Issues and Considerations: ACOG Committee Statement No. 8
- PMID: 38237165
- DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005474
Permanent Contraception: Ethical Issues and Considerations: ACOG Committee Statement No. 8
Abstract
Permanent contraception is the most used method of contraception among women aged 15-49 years and is one of the most straightforward surgical procedures an obstetrician-gynecologist can perform. At the same time, this therapeutic option is enormously complex when considered from a historical, sociological, or ethical perspective. This Committee Statement reviews ethical issues related to permanent contraception using a reproductive justice framework. Ethical counseling and shared decision making for permanent contraception should adopt a nonjudgmental, patient-centered approach, using up-to-date information about permanent contraception procedures and alternatives. Obstetrician-gynecologists should strive to avoid bringing into the clinical encounter biases around gender, race, age, and class that affect thoughts on who should or should not become a parent. Obstetrician-gynecologists should also ensure that permanent contraception requests reflect each patient's wishes, come from a desire to permanently end childbearing, and come from a preference for permanent contraception over all reversible methods as well as permanent contraception for the male partner. When difficulties in meeting a postpartum permanent contraception request are anticipated and permanent contraception is desired by the patient, transfer of care for the remainder of pregnancy should be offered. ACOG recognizes the right of all patients to unimpeded access to permanent contraception as a way of ensuring health equity, but it is unclear how to craft policies that protect from coercion but also do not create barriers to autonomously desired care. Determining the ethical balance between access and safeguards will require a collaborative interdisciplinary approach that involves a variety of stakeholders with varying perspectives.
Copyright © 2024 by the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Patient and obstetrician-gynecologist perspectives on considering long-acting reversible contraception for postpartum patients who desire permanent contraception.Contraception. 2025 Mar;143:110781. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110781. Epub 2024 Dec 4. Contraception. 2025. PMID: 39643255
-
Committee Opinion No. 695: Sterilization of Women: Ethical Issues and Considerations.Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;129(4):e109-e116. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002023. Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 28333823
-
Committee Opinion No 695 Summary: Sterilization of Women: Ethical Issues and Considerations.Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Apr;129(4):775-776. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002013. Obstet Gynecol. 2017. PMID: 28333815
-
Female permanent contraception trends and updates.Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022 Jun;226(6):773-780. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.12.261. Epub 2021 Dec 29. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2022. PMID: 34973178 Review.
-
Canadian Contraception Consensus (Part 1 of 4).J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015 Oct;37(10):936-42. doi: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30033-0. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2015. PMID: 26606712 English, French.
Cited by
-
Food Insecurity and Women's Choice of Reversible Contraceptives: Differential Effects by Maternal Age.Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Oct 10;21(10):1343. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21101343. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39457316 Free PMC article.
-
Modeling the impact of decreasing waiting period length for Medicaid sterilization: A multi-site cohort study.Contraception. 2024 Nov;139:110531. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2024.110531. Epub 2024 Jun 21. Contraception. 2024. PMID: 38909745
-
Informed consent and ethical issues pertaining to female sterilization-Scoping review.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025 Jun;169(3):1037-1064. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.16100. Epub 2025 Jan 4. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2025. PMID: 39754449 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Effect of Patient Age on Decisional Regret After Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Dec 1;144(6):757-764. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000005730. Epub 2024 Sep 19. Obstet Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 39601703
-
A Decision Aid to Support Tubal Sterilization Decision-Making Among Pregnant Women: The MyDecision/MiDecisión Randomized Clinical Trial.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Mar 4;7(3):e242215. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.2215. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38502127 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Daniels K, Abma JC. Current contraceptive status among women aged 15-49: United States, 2017-2019. NCHS Data Brief 2020:1–8.
-
- Bartz D, Greenberg JA. Sterilization in the United States. Rev Obstet Gynecol 2008;1:23–32.
-
- Jensen JT. Permanent contraception: modern approaches justify a new name. Contraception 2014;89:493–4. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.01.007 - DOI
-
- Lombardo PA. Three generations, no imbeciles: eugenics, the Supreme Court, and Buck v. Bell. Johns Hopkins University Press; 2022.
-
- Harris LH, Wolfe T. Stratified reproduction, family planning care and the double edge of history. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2014;26:539–44. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000121 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical