Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 18;11(1):85.
doi: 10.1038/s41597-023-02906-5.

Projected income data under different shared socioeconomic pathways for Washington state

Affiliations

Projected income data under different shared socioeconomic pathways for Washington state

Heng Wan et al. Sci Data. .

Erratum in

Abstract

High-resolution income projections under different Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSPs) are essential for the climate change research communities to devise climate change adaptation and mitigation strategies. To generate income projections for Washington state, we obtain state-level GDP per capita projections and convert them into projected annual household income. The resulting state-level income projections are subsequently downscaled to the census block-level based on the Longitudinal Origin-Destination Employment Statistics (LODES) dataset. For accuracy assessment, we downscale historical income data from state- level to block- and block group-level and compare the downscaled results against the actual income data from LODES. County-level accuracy assessment is also conducted based on American Community Survey. The results demonstrate a good agreement (Average R2 of 0.67, 0.8, and 0.99 for block-, block group-, and county-level, respectively) between the downscaled income data and the reference data, thereby validating the methodology employed. Our approach is applicable to other states for income projections, which can be utilized by a broader audience, including those involved in demographic analysis, economic research, and urban planning.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Workflow for income reconciliation.

References

    1. Becker GS, Murphy KM, Werning I. The equilibrium distribution of income and the market for status. Journal of Political Economy. 2005;113:282–310. doi: 10.1086/427463. - DOI
    1. Bischoff O. Explaining regional variation in equilibrium real estate prices and income. Journal of Housing Economics. 2012;21:1–15. doi: 10.1016/j.jhe.2011.11.002. - DOI
    1. Fransham M. Income and population dynamics in deprived neighbourhoods: measuring the poverty turnover rate using administrative data. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy. 2019;12:275–300. doi: 10.1007/s12061-017-9242-6. - DOI
    1. Zhou X. Economic transformation and income inequality in urban China: evidence from panel data. American Journal of Sociology. 2000;105:1135–1174. doi: 10.1086/210401. - DOI
    1. Zhou Q, Shi W. How does town planning affect urban-rural income inequality: evidence from China with simultaneous equation analysis. Landscape and Urban Planning. 2022;221:104380. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104380. - DOI