Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Assessment of genetically modified maize DP23211 for food and feed uses, under Regulation (EC) No 1829/2003 (application EFSA-GMO-NL-2019-163)

EFSA Panel on Genetically Modified Organisms (GMO) et al. EFSA J. .

Abstract

Genetically modified maize DP23211 was developed to confer control of certain coleopteran pests and tolerance to glufosinate-containing herbicide. These properties were achieved by introducing the pmi, mo-pat, ipd072Aa and DvSSJ1 expression cassettes. The molecular characterisation data and bioinformatic analyses do not identify issues requiring food/feed safety assessment. None of the identified differences in the agronomic/phenotypic and compositional characteristics tested between maize DP23211 and its conventional counterpart needs further assessment, except for those in levels of histidine, phenylalanine, magnesium, phosphorus and folic acid in grain, which do not raise safety and nutritional concerns. The GMO Panel does not identify safety concerns regarding the toxicity and allergenicity of the IPD072Aa, PAT and PMI proteins and the DvSSJ1 dsRNA and derived siRNAs newly expressed in maize DP23211, and finds no evidence that the genetic modification impacts the overall safety of maize DP23211. In the context of this application, the consumption of food and feed from maize DP23211 does not represent a nutritional concern in humans and animals. Therefore, no post-market monitoring of food/feed is considered necessary. In the case of accidental release of viable maize DP23211 grains into the environment, this would not raise environmental safety concerns. The post-market environmental monitoring plan and reporting intervals are in line with the intended uses of maize DP23211. The GMO Panel concludes that maize DP23211 is as safe as its conventional counterpart and the tested non-GM reference varieties with respect to potential effects on human and animal health and the environment.

Keywords: DP23211; DvSSJ1; GM; IPD072Aa; PAT; PMI; genetic engineering; import and processing; maize (Zea mays).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

If you wish to access the declaration of interests of any expert contributing to an EFSA scientific assessment, please contact interestmanagement@efsa.europa.eu.

References

    1. Anderson, J. A. , & Kim, Y. C. (2018). Biopesticides produced by plant‐probiotic Pseudomonas chlororaphis isolates. Crop Protection, 105, 62–69. 10.1016/j.cropro.2017.11.009 - DOI
    1. Anderson, J. A. , Staley, J. , Challender, M. , & Heuton, J. (2018). Safety of Pseudomonas chlororaphis as a gene source for genetically modified crops. Transgenic Research, 27(1), 103–113. 10.1007/s11248-018-0061-6 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Breiteneder, H. , & Mills, E. N. (2005). Molecular properties of food allergens. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, 115, 14–23. - PubMed
    1. Carlson, A. B. , Mathesius, C. A. , Ballou, S. , Boeckman, C. J. , Gunderson, T. A. , Mirsky, H. P. , Mukerji, P. , Roe, J. C. , Schmidt, J. M. , Zhang, J. , & Delaney, B. (2019). Safety assessment of coleopteran active IPD072Aa protein from Psuedomonas chlororaphis . Food and Chemical Toxicology, 129, 376–381. 10.1016/j.fct.2019.04.055 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Codex Alimentarius . (2009). Foods Derived from Modern Biotechnology. Codex Alimentarius Commission, Joint FAO/WHO Food Standards Programme, Rome. http://www.fao.org/docrep/011/a1554e/a1554e00.htm