The authors reply
- PMID: 38240522
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006115
The authors reply
Conflict of interest statement
Dr. Szakmany received funding from ThermoFisher UK and PAION UK. The remaining authors have disclosed that they do not have any potential conflicts of interest.
Comment on
-
Comparing Traditional Regression and Machine Learning Models in Predicting Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Mortality.Crit Care Med. 2024 Feb 1;52(2):e105-e106. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000006084. Epub 2024 Jan 19. Crit Care Med. 2024. PMID: 38240521 No abstract available.
References
-
- Valiente Fernández M, Lesmes González de Aledo A, Martin Badía I, et al.: Comparing Traditional Regression and Machine Learning Models in Predicting Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Mortality.. Crit Care Med. 2024; 52:e105–e106
-
- Villar J, González-Martín JM, Hernández-González J, et al.; Predicting Outcome and STratifiCation of severity in ARDS (POSTCARDS) Network: Predicting ICU mortality in acute respiratory distress syndrome patients using machine learning: The Predicting Outcome and STratifiCation of severity in ARDS (POSTCARDS) study. Crit Care Med. 2023; 51:1638–1649
-
- Villar J, González-Martin JM, Ambrós A, et al.; Spanish Initiative for Epidemiology, Stratification and Therapies of ARDS (SIESTA) Network: Stratification for identification of prognostic categories in the acute respiratory distress syndrome (SPIRES) score. Crit Care Med. 2021; 49:e920–e930
-
- Bouvarel B, Carrat F, Lapidus N: Updating mortality risk estimation in intensive care units from high-dimensional electronic health records with incomplete data. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023; 23:170
-
- Kacmarek RM, Berra L: Prediction of ARDS outcome: What tool should I use? Lancet Respir Med. 2018; 6:253–254
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources