Utilization and Perception of Peer-Support After Lower Limb Loss in the United States: Potential Benefits on Mobility Outcomes
- PMID: 38242299
- PMCID: PMC11069449
- DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2023.12.009
Utilization and Perception of Peer-Support After Lower Limb Loss in the United States: Potential Benefits on Mobility Outcomes
Abstract
Objective: To examine participants' experiences with peer-support after lower limb loss (LLL) and the associations between the peer-support experience (perceived benefits and barriers) and mobility outcomes.
Design: Quantitative and qualitative descriptive study with a cross-sectional design.
Setting: National survey (distributed to 169 peer-support groups in 44 states in the US).
Participants: The survey was completed by 82 individuals with a major lower limb amputation (53% female, 54% over 55 years of age; N=82).
Main outcome measures: A 32-item survey to examine respondents' experiences in peer-support activities. Prosthetic mobility was measured using the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M).
Results: Two out of 3 respondents received some forms of peer-support after amputation. Among them 75% reported peer-support having a positive effect on their outlook on life, and 78% reported that information gained from peer-support was helpful. Companionship, altruistic acts, and gaining information on how to cope with amputation were the top themes of why respondents enjoyed the peer-support experience. Nearly all (94%) respondents would recommend peer-support to other people with LLL. Individuals who received peer-support exhibited a trend of greater mobility (55th vs 36th percentile on PLUS-M; P=.055).
Conclusion: Individuals with LLL reported generally positive experiences regarding their engagement in peer-support activities. Peer-support groups are viewed as a helpful source for both information and emotional support, potentially benefiting functional and psychological recovery after amputation. Individuals who have received peer-support also exhibited greater mobility.
Keywords: Amputation; Lower limb loss; Mobility; Peer-support; Qualitative analysis; Survey.
Copyright © 2024 American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration Of Competing Interest
The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interests.
Figures
References
-
- Ziegler-Graham K, MacKenzie EJ, Ephraim PL, Travison TG, Brookmeyer R. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2008;89(3):422–429. - PubMed
-
- Geiss LS, Li Y, Hora I, Albright A, Rolka D, Gregg EW. Resurgence of Diabetes-Related Nontraumatic Lower-Extremity Amputation in the Young and Middle-Aged Adult U.S. Population . Diabetes care. 2019;42(1):50–54. - PubMed
-
- Ulger O, Sahan TY, Celik SE. A systematic literature review of physiotherapy and rehabilitation approaches to lower-limb amputation. Physiotherapy theory and practice. 2018;34(11):821–834. - PubMed
-
- Heyns A, Jacobs S, Negrini S, Patrini M, Rauch A, Kiekens C. Systematic Review of Clinical Practice Guidelines for Individuals With Amputation: Identification of Best Evidence for Rehabilitation to Develop the WHO’s Package of Interventions for Rehabilitation. Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation. 2021;102(6):1191–1197. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical