Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 May 22;29(3):162-170.
doi: 10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112434.

Efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for primary dysmenorrhoea: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

Affiliations

Efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for primary dysmenorrhoea: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis

Xinglin Li et al. BMJ Evid Based Med. .

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the relative benefits of various non-pharmacological interventions on treating primary dysmenorrhoea within a network meta-analysis.

Study design: Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Inclusion criteria: Randomised controlled trial involving patient with primary dysmenorrhoea and received non-pharmacological interventions.

Data sources: Four databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science) were searched from inception to October first, 2022.

Risk-of-bias rob assessment: RoB 2.0 assessment tools was used to assess the risk of bias in the included studies.

Synthesis of results: Conventional meta-analysis was conducted by pairwise comparison between non-pharmacological therapy and control treatment. The Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted by the Aggregate Data Drug Information System Software based on the consistency or inconsistency model, and rank probability was used to indicate the priority of non-pharmacological therapy.

Results: 33 studies involving eight non-pharmacological interventions were included. With regard to conventional meta-analysis, we selected Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) as primary outcome to evaluate the pain intensity. The result showed that eight interventions (Exercise, Herb, Acupuncture, Aromatherapy, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation, Topical heat, Acupressure, Yoga) displayed positive effect on reduction of menstrual pain compared with placebo or no treatment. A Bayesian network meta-analysis revealed that exercise -3.20 (95% CI -4.01 to -2.34), acupuncture -2.90 (95% CI -3.97 to -2.85) and topical heat -2.97 (95% CI -4.66 to -1.29) probably resulted in a reduction in pain intensity (VAS) .

Conclusions: Non-pharmacological interventions may result in a reduction or slight reduction in pain intensity compared with no treatment or placebo. Specifically, exercise and acupuncture are considered as potentially effective non-pharmacological treatments in short-term treatment. Indeed, larger and better methodological quality research is needed.

Trial registration number: CRD42022351021.

Keywords: acupuncture; women's health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart for the selection of randomised trials.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Network of analysed comparisons in the network meta-analyses of the primary outcome (VAS). TENS, Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Forest plot for pain intensity (VAS) in comparison of acupuncture versus no intervention.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Forest plot for pain intensity (VAS) in comparison of exercise versus no intervention.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lee CH, Roh J-W, Lim C-Y, et al. . A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating the efficacy and safety of a far infrared-emitting Sericite belt in patients with primary Dysmenorrhea. Complement Ther Med 2011;19:187–93. 10.1016/j.ctim.2011.06.004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gutman G, Nunez AT, Fisher M. Dysmenorrhea in adolescents. Curr Probl Pediatr Adolesc Health Care 2022;52:S1538-5442(22)00055-4. 10.1016/j.cppeds.2022.101186 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sharghi M, Mansurkhani SM, Larky DA, et al. . An update and systematic review on the treatment of primary Dysmenorrhea. JBRA Assist Reprod 2019;23:51–7. 10.5935/1518-0557.20180083 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Marjoribanks J, Proctor M, Farquhar C, et al. . Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for Dysmenorrhoea.Cochrane database SYST Rev. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010:CD001751. 10.1002/14651858.CD001751.pub2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Iwata M, Oikawa Y, Shimizu Y, et al. . Efficacy of low-dose estrogen-Progestins and Progestins in Japanese women with Dysmenorrhea: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Adv Ther 2022;39:4892–909. 10.1007/s12325-022-02298-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types