Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Sep 26;74(747):e674-e682.
doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2023.0149. Print 2024 Oct.

Access systems in general practice: a systematic scoping review

Affiliations

Access systems in general practice: a systematic scoping review

Abi Eccles et al. Br J Gen Pract. .

Abstract

Background: Access to GP appointments is increasingly challenging in many high-income countries, with an overstretched workforce and rising demand. Various access systems have been developed and evaluated internationally.

Aim: To systematically consolidate the current international evidence base related to different types of GP access systems.

Design and setting: Scoping review examining international literature.

Method: Literature searches were run across relevant databases in May 2022. Title, abstract, and full-text screenings were carried out. Data from included studies were extracted and mapped to synthesise the components and aims within different GP access systems.

Results: In total, 49 studies were included in the review. The majority of these were set in the UK. Some access systems featured heavily in the literature, such as Advanced Access, telephone triage, and online consultations, and others less so. There were two key strategies adopted by systems that related to either changing appointment capacity or modifying patient pathways. Components related to these strategies are summarised and illustrated as a schematic representation. Most rationales behind access systems were practice, rather than patient, focused. 'Add-on' systems and aims for efficiency have become more popular in recent years.

Conclusion: This synthesis provides a useful tool in understanding access systems' aims, design, and implementation. With focus on alleviating demand, patient-focused outcomes appear to be underinvestigated and potentially overlooked during design and implementation. More recently, digital services have been promoted as offering patient choice and convenience. But a context where demand outweighs resources challenges the premise that extending choice is possible.

Keywords: appointments and schedules; general practice; primary health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Flow diagram: results from the screening process.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Schematic representation of the components of access systems empirically studied. PN = practice nurse. SMS = short message service.

References

    1. Cowling TE, Gunning EJ. Access to general practice in England: political, theoretical, and empirical considerations. Br J Gen Pract. 2016 doi: 10.3399/bjgp16X686977. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boyle S, Appleby J, Harrison A. A rapid view of access to care. London: The King’s Fund; 2010.
    1. Cowling TE, Harris MJ, Majeed A. Evidence and rhetoric about access to UK primary care. BMJ. 2015;350:h1513. - PubMed
    1. Pereira Gray DJ, Sidaway-Lee K, White E, et al. Continuity of care with doctors — a matter of life and death? A systematic review of continuity of care and mortality. BMJ Open. 2018;8(6):e021161. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sandvik H, Hetlevik Ø, Blinkenberg J, Hunskaar S. Continuity in general practice as predictor of mortality, acute hospitalisation, and use of out-of-hours care: a registry-based observational study in Norway. Br J Gen Pract. 2022 doi: 10.3399/BJGP.2021.0340. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources