Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jan;30(1):61-75.
doi: 10.1038/s41591-023-02732-7. Epub 2024 Jan 19.

The IDEAL framework for surgical robotics: development, comparative evaluation and long-term monitoring

Collaborators, Affiliations
Review

The IDEAL framework for surgical robotics: development, comparative evaluation and long-term monitoring

Hani J Marcus et al. Nat Med. 2024 Jan.

Erratum in

Abstract

The next generation of surgical robotics is poised to disrupt healthcare systems worldwide, requiring new frameworks for evaluation. However, evaluation during a surgical robot's development is challenging due to their complex evolving nature, potential for wider system disruption and integration with complementary technologies like artificial intelligence. Comparative clinical studies require attention to intervention context, learning curves and standardized outcomes. Long-term monitoring needs to transition toward collaborative, transparent and inclusive consortiums for real-world data collection. Here, the Idea, Development, Exploration, Assessment and Long-term monitoring (IDEAL) Robotics Colloquium proposes recommendations for evaluation during development, comparative study and clinical monitoring of surgical robots-providing practical recommendations for developers, clinicians, patients and healthcare systems. Multiple perspectives are considered, including economics, surgical training, human factors, ethics, patient perspectives and sustainability. Further work is needed on standardized metrics, health economic assessment models and global applicability of recommendations.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Lee, N. Robotic surgery: where are we now? Lancet 384, 1417 (2014). - PubMed - DOI
    1. Kwoh, Y. S., Hou, J., Jonckheere, E. A. & Hayati, S. A robot with improved absolute positioning accuracy for CT guided stereotactic brain surgery. IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng. 35, 153–160 (1988). - PubMed - DOI
    1. Peters, B. S., Armijo, P. R., Krause, C., Choudhury, S. A. & Oleynikov, D. Review of emerging surgical robotic technology. Surg. Endosc. 32, 1636–1655 (2018). - PubMed - DOI
    1. Maynou, L., Pearson, G., McGuire, A. & Serra-Sastre, V. The diffusion of robotic surgery: examining technology use in the English NHS. Health Policy 126, 325–336 (2022). - PubMed - DOI
    1. The Lancet. Robotic surgery evaluation: 10 years too late. Lancet 388, 1026 (2016).

LinkOut - more resources