Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 19;12(1):41.
doi: 10.1186/s40359-023-01276-2.

Assessing psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the Sleep Quality Questionnaire among healthcare students

Affiliations

Assessing psychometric properties and measurement invariance of the Sleep Quality Questionnaire among healthcare students

Mengyi Huang et al. BMC Psychol. .

Abstract

Objective: The sleep of healthcare students is worth discovering. Mental health and self-rated health are thought to be associated with sleep quality. As such, valid instruments to assess sleep quality in healthcare students are crucial and irreplaceable. This study aimed to investigate the measurement properties of the Sleep Quality Questionnaire (SQQ) for Chinese healthcare students.

Methods: Two longitudinal assessments were undertaken among healthcare students, with a total of 595, between December 2020 and January 2021. Measures include the Chinese version of the SQQ, Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4), Self-Rated Health Questionnaire (SRHQ), and sociodemographic questionnaire. Structural validity through confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted to examine factor structure of the SQQ. T-tests and ANOVAs were used to examine sociodemographic differences in sleep quality scores. Multi Group CFA and longitudinal CFA were respectively used to assess cross-sectional invariance and longitudinal invariance across two-time interval, i.e., cross-cultural validity. Construct validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability were correspondingly examined via Spearman correlation, Cronbach's alpha and McDonald's omega, and intraclass correlation coefficient. Multiple linear regression analysis was performed to examine incremental validity of the SQQ based on the PHQ-4 and SRHQ as indicators of the criterion variables.

Results: CFA results suggested that the two-factor model of the SQQ-9 (item 2 excluded) had the best fit. The SQQ-9 scores differed significantly by age, grade, academic stage, hobby, stress coping strategy, anxiety, depression, and self-rated health subgroups. Measurement invariance was supported in terms of aforesaid subgroups and across two time intervals. In correlation and regression analyses, anxiety, depression, and self-rated health were moderately strong predictors of sleep quality. The SQQ-9 had good internal consistency and test-retest reliability.

Conclusion: Good measurement properties suggest that the SQQ is a promising and practical measurement instrument for assessing sleep quality of Chinese healthcare students.

Keywords: Assessment instrument; Healthcare students; Measurement properties; Observational longitudinal study; Sleep Quality Questionnaire.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Item–factor, factor–total, and discriminant correlations between the SQQ, PHQ-4, and SRHQ (N = 595). Note: Spearman correlations, T1 Time 1, T2 Time 2, SQQ Sleep Quality Questionnaire, SQQ01-10 item 1–10, SDS Sleep Difficulty Subscale, DSS Daytime Sleepiness Subscale, DSS (-) item 2 excluded from the DSS, SQQ-9 item 2 excluded from the SQQ, GAD Generalized Anxiety Disorder, PHQ Patient Health Questionnaire, SRHQ Self-Rated Health Questionnaire

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Buysse DJ. Sleep health: can we define it? Does it matter? Sleep. 2014;37(1):9–17. doi: 10.5665/sleep.3298. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kline C: Sleep quality. In: Encyclopedia of Behavioral Medicine. edn. Edited by Marc D. Gellman JRT; 2013: 1811–1813 10.1007/978-1-4419-1005-9_849.
    1. Krystal AD, Edinger JD. Measuring sleep quality. Sleep Med. 2008;9:S10–S17. doi: 10.1016/S1389-9457(08)70011-X. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nelson KL, Davis JE, Corbett CF. Sleep quality: An evolutionary concept analysis. Nurs Forum. 2022;57(1):144–151. doi: 10.1111/nuf.12659. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ohayon M, Wickwire EM, Hirshkowitz M, Albert SM, Avidan A, Daly FJ, Dauvilliers Y, Ferri R, Fung C, Gozal D, et al. National Sleep Foundation's sleep quality recommendations: first report. Sleep Health. 2017;3(1):6–19. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2016.11.006. - DOI - PubMed