Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar 11;379(1897):20230026.
doi: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0026. Epub 2024 Jan 22.

Human and nonhuman norms: a dimensional framework

Affiliations

Human and nonhuman norms: a dimensional framework

Kristin Andrews et al. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Human communities teem with a variety of social norms. In order to change unjust and harmful social norms, it is crucial to identify the psychological processes that give rise to them. Most researchers take it for granted that social norms are uniquely human. By contrast, we approach this matter from a comparative perspective, leveraging recent research on animal social behaviour. While there is currently only suggestive evidence for norms in nonhuman communities, we argue that human social norms are likely produced by a wide range of mechanisms, many of which we share with nonhuman animals. Approaching this variability from a comparative perspective can help norm researchers expand and reframe the range of hypotheses they test when attempting to understand the causes of socially normative behaviours in humans. First, we diagnose some of the theoretical obstacles to developing a comparative science of social norms, and offer a few basic constructs and distinctions to help norm researchers overcome these obstacles. Then we develop a six-dimensional model of the psychological and social factors that contribute to variability in both human and potential nonhuman norms. This article is part of the theme issue 'Social norm change: drivers and consequences'.

Keywords: animal cognition; animal culture; norm psychology; punishment; social norms; teaching‌.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare we have no competing interests.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Geometrical representation of the social norms-space in three species. Human children are chosen to illustrate that this space can also be expected to change over development. This space can also be used to represent particular norms and the processes that underpin them.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kelly D. 2020. Internalized norms and intrinsic motivation: are normative motivations psychologically primitive? Emotion Researcher 1, 36-45.
    1. de Waal FBM. 2014. Natural normativity: The ‘is’ and ‘ought’ of animal behavior. Behaviour 151, 185-204. (10.1163/1568539X-00003146) - DOI
    1. Sakamaki T, Itoh N, Nishida T. 2001. An attempted within-group infanticide in wild chimpanzees. Primates 42, 359-366. (10.1007/BF02629626) - DOI
    1. Murray CM, Wroblewski E, Pusey AE. 2007. New case of intragroup infanticide in the chimpanzees of Gombe National Park. Int. J. Primatol. 28, 23-37. (10.1007/s10764-006-9111-7) - DOI
    1. Rudolf von Rohr C, Burkart J, van Schaik C. 2011. Evolutionary precursors of social norms in chimpanzees: a new approach. Biol. Phil. 26, 1-30. (10.1007/s10539-010-9240-4) - DOI

LinkOut - more resources