Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 20;14(1):1798.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-52288-w.

Child inhibited temperament and caregiver distraction encouragement jointly predict children's delay of gratification competencies

Affiliations

Child inhibited temperament and caregiver distraction encouragement jointly predict children's delay of gratification competencies

Anna Luerssen et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

A cool attentional focus during the classic delay of gratification (DG) task involves shifting attention away from the emotion-arousing features and is a key mechanism that underlies children's ability to resist temptation and wait. Yet, we know relatively little about what gives rise to individual differences in cool focus in the first place. The current study (N = 162, Mage = 6.86 years) addressed this question by focusing on key aspects of child temperament (i.e., behavioral inhibition, BI) and caregiver emotion socialization (i.e., distraction encouragement) as joint predictors of cool focus. We theorized that because children are left alone in an unfamiliar environment for an undefined duration, the DG task would be especially taxing for children higher in BI, hindering their ability to deploy a cool focus and wait. We also reasoned that caregiver encouragement of distraction would serve as a protective factor by allowing children higher in BI to more easily activate a cool focus even when experiencing a taxing task. Results were partially consistent with these hypotheses, shedding new light on precursors to a central ingredient of DG ability.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Cool focus pertains to the delay of gratification task. Child behavioral inhibition was measured with items from The Child Behavior Questionnaire—Very Short Form. Caregiver distraction encouragement was measured with a modified version of The Coping with Children’s Negative Emotions Scale. Both behavioral inhibition and distraction encouragement were mean-centered. Predicted values are one standard deviation above and below the mean of caregiver distraction encouragement. Highly inhibited children were significantly higher in cool focus during the DG task to the degree that their caregivers encouraged distraction during everyday emotionally evocative events.

References

    1. Mischel W, Ayduk Ö. Willpower in a cognitive-affective processing system: The dynamics of delay of gratification. In: Vohs KD, Baumeister RF, editors. Handbook of Self-Regulation: Research, Theory, and Applications. 2. Guilford; 2011. pp. 83–105.
    1. Mischel W, Shoda Y, Rodriguez ML. Delay of gratification in children. Science. 1989;244(4907):933–938. doi: 10.1126/science.2658056. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ayduk Ö, et al. Regulating the interpersonal self: Strategic self-regulation for coping with rejection sensitivity. J. Personal. Soc. Psy. 2000;79(5):776–792. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.79.5.776. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Duckworth AL, Tsukayama E, Kirby TA. Is it really self-control? Examining the predictive power of the delay of gratification task. Personal. Soc. Psy. Bull. 2013;39(7):843–855. doi: 10.1177/0146167213482589. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Michaelson LE, Munakata Y. Same data set, different conclusions: Preschool delay of gratification predicts later behavioral outcomes in a preregistered study. Psy. Sci. 2020;31(2):193–201. doi: 10.1177/0956797619896270. - DOI - PMC - PubMed