COVID-19 Personal Protective Behaviors during Large Social Events: The Value of Behavioral Observations
- PMID: 38247715
- PMCID: PMC10813672
- DOI: 10.3390/bs14010063
COVID-19 Personal Protective Behaviors during Large Social Events: The Value of Behavioral Observations
Abstract
Within the context of reopening society in the summer of 2021, as the UK moved away from 'lockdowns', the Government of Wales piloted the return of organized 'mass gatherings' of people at a number of test events. The current study reports behavioral observations that were made at two of the test events to inform this process. The researchers were particularly interested in four key factors: how (1) context within a venue, (2) environmental design, (3) staffing and social norms, and (4) time across an event, affected the personal protective behaviors of social distancing and face-covering use. Data collection was undertaken by trained observers. Adherence to protective behaviors was generally high, but there is clear evidence that these behaviors were shaped in a systematic way by the environment, situational cues, and the passage of time during the events. Some instances of large-scale non-adherence to personal protective behaviors were documented. An analysis within a dual-process framework suggests ways to understand and respond to supporting target health behaviors in groups of people where intervention is deemed valuable, such as in complex or ambiguous contexts. This is one of the first studies to include a 'true' behavioral measure in understanding human responses to COVID-19. It demonstrates that behavioral observations can add precision and granularity to understanding human behavior in complex real-world contexts. Given the significant physical and mental health burden created acutely and chronically by COVID-19, this work has implications for how governments and organizations support target populations in other complex challenges facing us today, such as in sustainability, and healthy lifestyle behaviors. An individual's intentions are not always matched by their actions, and so the findings support a balanced liberal paternalistic approach where system-level changes support appropriate individual-level decisions to engender collective responsibility and action.
Keywords: COVID-19; behavior; dual-process; mass-gathering; observation; prevention.
Conflict of interest statement
At the time the research was conducted, A.G., L.L., J.W., L.E., L.G. and H.H.-D. all worked for Public Health Wales. C.R. worked for the Welsh Government. All authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as potential conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Impact of summer programmes on the outcomes of disadvantaged or 'at risk' young people: A systematic review.Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Jun 13;20(2):e1406. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1406. eCollection 2024 Jun. Campbell Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38873396 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Social Distance in COVID-19: Drawing the line between protective behavior and stigma manifestation.Psychiatriki. 2021 Sep 20;32(3):183-186. doi: 10.22365/jpsych.2021.025. Epub 2021 Aug 5. Psychiatriki. 2021. PMID: 34390552 English, Greek, Modern.
-
Habits and Reflective Processes in COVID-19 Transmission-reducing Behaviors: Examining Theoretical Predictions in a Representative Sample of the Population of Scotland.Ann Behav Med. 2023 Oct 16;57(11):910-920. doi: 10.1093/abm/kaad025. Ann Behav Med. 2023. PMID: 37319346 Free PMC article.
-
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001. JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009. PMID: 27820426
-
Communication to promote and support physical distancing for COVID-19 prevention and control.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Oct 9;10(10):CD015144. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015144. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 37811673 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Preventative behavioural interventions that reduce health inequities: a systematic review using the theoretical domains framework.BMC Public Health. 2025 May 23;25(1):1905. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22740-1. BMC Public Health. 2025. PMID: 40410743 Free PMC article.
-
Decision making techniques in mass gathering medicine during the COVID-19 pandemia: a scoping review.Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 15;12:1493218. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1493218. eCollection 2024. Front Public Health. 2024. PMID: 39473605 Free PMC article.
-
Promoting Behavioral Change to Improve Health Outcomes.Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 25;15(4):417. doi: 10.3390/bs15040417. Behav Sci (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40282039 Free PMC article.
-
Closing the Gap: How Psychological Distance Influences Willingness to Engage in Risky COVID Behavior.Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 May 27;14(6):449. doi: 10.3390/bs14060449. Behav Sci (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38920782 Free PMC article.
-
Integrating Systems Thinking and Behavioural Science.Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Mar 21;15(4):403. doi: 10.3390/bs15040403. Behav Sci (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40282025 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Petherick A., Kira B., Cameron-Blake E., Tatlow H., Hallas L., Hale T., Phillips T., Zhang Y., Webster S., Anania J., et al. Variation in Government Responses to COVID-19. 2021. [(accessed on 1 April 2022)]. Available online: https://www.bsg.ox.ac.uk/research/publications/variation-government-resp....
-
- Lozano Nasi V., Jans L., Steg L. Individual transilience in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Environ. Psychol. 2024;93:102188. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2023.102188. - DOI
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources