Unveiling Neurocognitive Disparities in Encoding and Retrieval between Paper and Digital Tablet-Based Learning
- PMID: 38248291
- PMCID: PMC10813309
- DOI: 10.3390/brainsci14010076
Unveiling Neurocognitive Disparities in Encoding and Retrieval between Paper and Digital Tablet-Based Learning
Abstract
The widespread use of mobile devices and laptops has replaced traditional paper-based learning and the question of how the brain efficiency of digital tablet-based learning differs from that of paper-based learning remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference in brain efficiency for learning between paper-based and digital tablet-based learning by measuring activity in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Thirty-two subjects were randomly assigned to the paper-based learning or the digital tablet-based learning group. Subjects in each group performed a memory task that required memorizing a three-minute novel (encoding phase) on a paper or digital tablet, followed by a test in which they answered four multiple-choice questions based on the novel's content. To compare both groups, behavioral performance on the test (retrieval phase) and activity in the PFC were measured. As a result, no significant difference in behavioral performance between both groups was observed (p > 0.05). However, the paper-based learning group showed significantly lower activity in the PFC in the encoding phase than the digital tablet-based learning group (p < 0.05) but not in the retrieval phase. The current study demonstrated that brain efficiency in encoding is higher in subjects with paper-based learning than those with digital tablet-based learning. This finding has important implications for education, particularly in terms of the pros and cons of electronic document-based learning.
Keywords: brain efficiency; education; fNIRS; learning; memory.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Modeling Brain Dynamics During Virtual Reality-Based Emergency Response Learning Under Stress.Hum Factors. 2023 Dec;65(8):1804-1820. doi: 10.1177/00187208211054894. Epub 2021 Dec 5. Hum Factors. 2023. PMID: 34865562 Clinical Trial.
-
Paper Notebooks vs. Mobile Devices: Brain Activation Differences During Memory Retrieval.Front Behav Neurosci. 2021 Mar 19;15:634158. doi: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.634158. eCollection 2021. Front Behav Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 33815075 Free PMC article.
-
Involvement of the prefrontal cortex in motor sequence learning: A functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) study.Brain Cogn. 2023 Mar;166:105940. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2022.105940. Epub 2023 Jan 6. Brain Cogn. 2023. PMID: 36621187 Clinical Trial.
-
Mobile Digital Education for Health Professions: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis by the Digital Health Education Collaboration.J Med Internet Res. 2019 Feb 12;21(2):e12937. doi: 10.2196/12937. J Med Internet Res. 2019. PMID: 30747711 Free PMC article.
-
Encoding and immediate retrieval tasks in patients with epilepsy: A functional MRI study of verbal and visual memory.J Neuroradiol. 2018 May;45(3):157-163. doi: 10.1016/j.neurad.2018.02.003. Epub 2018 Mar 1. J Neuroradiol. 2018. PMID: 29501535 Review.
Cited by
-
Middle-schoolers' reading and lexical-semantic processing depth in response to digital and print media: An N400 study.PLoS One. 2024 May 22;19(5):e0290807. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290807. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38776360 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Anuardi M.N.A.M., Yamazaki A.K., Sato I. The effects of tablet and printed media on brain activation during a short-memory task. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2020;176:1358–1365. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.145. - DOI
-
- Kretzschmar F., Pleimling D., Hosemann J., Fussel S., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I., Schlesewsky M. Subjective impressions do not mirror online reading effort: Concurrent EEG-eyetracking evidence from the reading of books and digital media. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e56178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056178. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Walsh G. Screen and paper reading research—A literature review. Aust. Acad. Res. Libr. 2016;47:160–173. doi: 10.1080/00048623.2016.1227661. - DOI
-
- Stoop J., Kreutzer P., Kircz J. Reading and learning from screen versus print: A study in changing habits; Part 1. N. Libr. World. 2013;114:284–300. doi: 10.1108/NLW-01-2013-0012. - DOI
-
- Myrberg C., Wiberg N. Screen vs. paper: What is the difference for reading and learning? Insight. 2015;28:49–54. doi: 10.1629/uksg.236. - DOI
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous