Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 12;14(1):76.
doi: 10.3390/brainsci14010076.

Unveiling Neurocognitive Disparities in Encoding and Retrieval between Paper and Digital Tablet-Based Learning

Affiliations

Unveiling Neurocognitive Disparities in Encoding and Retrieval between Paper and Digital Tablet-Based Learning

Si-An Lee et al. Brain Sci. .

Abstract

The widespread use of mobile devices and laptops has replaced traditional paper-based learning and the question of how the brain efficiency of digital tablet-based learning differs from that of paper-based learning remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference in brain efficiency for learning between paper-based and digital tablet-based learning by measuring activity in the prefrontal cortex (PFC) using functional near-infrared spectroscopy. Thirty-two subjects were randomly assigned to the paper-based learning or the digital tablet-based learning group. Subjects in each group performed a memory task that required memorizing a three-minute novel (encoding phase) on a paper or digital tablet, followed by a test in which they answered four multiple-choice questions based on the novel's content. To compare both groups, behavioral performance on the test (retrieval phase) and activity in the PFC were measured. As a result, no significant difference in behavioral performance between both groups was observed (p > 0.05). However, the paper-based learning group showed significantly lower activity in the PFC in the encoding phase than the digital tablet-based learning group (p < 0.05) but not in the retrieval phase. The current study demonstrated that brain efficiency in encoding is higher in subjects with paper-based learning than those with digital tablet-based learning. This finding has important implications for education, particularly in terms of the pros and cons of electronic document-based learning.

Keywords: brain efficiency; education; fNIRS; learning; memory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The placement of eight emitters, two detectors, and eight channels.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Boxplots of the effect of learning media on encoding (A) and retrieval phase (B). * p < 0.05.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Anuardi M.N.A.M., Yamazaki A.K., Sato I. The effects of tablet and printed media on brain activation during a short-memory task. Procedia Comput. Sci. 2020;176:1358–1365. doi: 10.1016/j.procs.2020.09.145. - DOI
    1. Kretzschmar F., Pleimling D., Hosemann J., Fussel S., Bornkessel-Schlesewsky I., Schlesewsky M. Subjective impressions do not mirror online reading effort: Concurrent EEG-eyetracking evidence from the reading of books and digital media. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e56178. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056178. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Walsh G. Screen and paper reading research—A literature review. Aust. Acad. Res. Libr. 2016;47:160–173. doi: 10.1080/00048623.2016.1227661. - DOI
    1. Stoop J., Kreutzer P., Kircz J. Reading and learning from screen versus print: A study in changing habits; Part 1. N. Libr. World. 2013;114:284–300. doi: 10.1108/NLW-01-2013-0012. - DOI
    1. Myrberg C., Wiberg N. Screen vs. paper: What is the difference for reading and learning? Insight. 2015;28:49–54. doi: 10.1629/uksg.236. - DOI