Assessing the Impact of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions on Consumer Mobility Patterns and COVID-19 Transmission in the US
- PMID: 38248532
- PMCID: PMC10815148
- DOI: 10.3390/ijerph21010067
Assessing the Impact of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions on Consumer Mobility Patterns and COVID-19 Transmission in the US
Abstract
The initial outbreak of COVID-19 during late December 2019 and the subsequent global pandemic markedly changed consumer mobility patterns worldwide, largely in response to government-ordered non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs). In this study, we investigate these changes as they relate to the initial spread of COVID-19 within two states-Massachusetts and Michigan. Specifically, we use linear and generalized linear mixed-effects models to quantify the relationship between four NPIs and individuals' point-of-sale (POS) credit card transactions, as well as the relationship between subsequent changes in POS transactions and county-level COVID-19 case growth rates. Our analysis reveals a significant negative association between NPIs and daily POS transactions, particularly a dose-response relationship, in which stringent workplace closures, stay-at-home requirements, and gathering restrictions were all associated with decreased POS transactions. We also uncover a significant positive association between 12-day lagged changes in POS transactions compared to pre-pandemic baselines and county-level COVID-19 case growth rates. Overall, our study supports previous findings that early NPIs reduced human mobility and COVID-19 transmission in the US, providing policymakers with quantitative evidence concerning the effectiveness of NPIs.
Keywords: COVID-19; longitudinal study; mixed-effects modeling; mobility; policy analysis; social distancing measures.
Conflict of interest statement
Authors J.Z. and L.S. were employed by the non-profit organization The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Ryan J. Volume I: COVID-19: Global Pandemic, Societal Responses, Ideological Solutions. Routledge; Abingdon, UK: 2021. Timeline of COVID-19; pp. xii–xxxiii.
-
- ACMJ A Timeline of COVID-19 Developments in 2020. 2021. [(accessed on 15 June 2023)]. Available online: https://www.ajmc.com/view/a-timeline-of-covid19-developments-in-2020.
-
- Davies H. Unlike COVID-19, Ebola Outbreak in DRC Disproportionately Affected Children. AAP News. 2020. [(accessed on 15 June 2023)]. Available online: www.aappublications.org/news/2020/04/29/ebola042220.
-
- Abbott B., Douglas J. How Deadly Is COVID-19? Researchers Are Getting Closer to an Answer. Wall Str. J. 2020. [(accessed on 15 June 2023)]. Available online: www.wsj.com/articles/how-deadly-is-covid-19-researchers-are-getting-clos....
-
- Pearce K. What Is Social Distancing and How Can It Slow the Spread of COVID-19? The Hub. 2020. [(accessed on 15 June 2023)]. Available online: https://hub.jhu.edu/2020/03/13/what-is-social-distancing/
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
