Evaluation of Cytotoxic and Genotoxic Effects in Buccal Mucosal Cells in Non-Smokers and Users of Traditional Combustible Tobacco Products and Non-Combustible Alternatives
- PMID: 38249106
- PMCID: PMC10801550
- DOI: 10.3390/jox14010009
Evaluation of Cytotoxic and Genotoxic Effects in Buccal Mucosal Cells in Non-Smokers and Users of Traditional Combustible Tobacco Products and Non-Combustible Alternatives
Abstract
Aims/objectives: The aim of this cross-sectional observational study was to investigate cytogenetic damage to the buccal mucosa in non-smokers and consumers of traditional combustible tobacco products and non-combustible alternatives.
Methods: A total of 160 participants were divided into four groups according to the type of product used, including non-smokers, users of conventional combustible tobacco (cigarettes), heated tobacco, and electronic, tobacco-free vapor products (e-cigarettes). Buccal mucosa samples were analyzed using the micronucleus cytome assay to assess cytotoxic and genotoxic damage.
Results: E-cigarette users showed significantly higher values for all tested parameters in the micronucleus test compared to non-smokers (p < 0.05). Similarly, users of tobacco heating products showed an increase in all parameters (p < 0.05), with the exception of the number of cells with micronuclei. Conventional cigarette smokers showed a notable increase in the number of binucleated cells and cells with karyorrhexis and karyolysis (p ≤ 0.05). When assessing the differences between users of traditional combustible tobacco products and non-combustible alternatives, these did not appear to be significant, except for e-cigarette users, who had significantly more cells with condensed chromatin (p ≤ 0.001), while users of tobacco heating products had more pyknotic cells (p ≤ 0.001).
Conclusion: The results of this study underscore the heightened occurrence of cytotoxic and genotoxic damage in users of both conventional combustible tobacco products and non-combustible alternatives compared to non-smokers, emphasizing the detrimental impact of these products on the oral mucosa.
Keywords: buccal mucosa; cytogenetic; cytotoxicity; e-cigarette; genotoxicity; heated tobacco products; micronucleus assay; smoking.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Urinary concentrations of monohydroxylated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in adults from the U.S. Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) Study Wave 1 (2013-2014).Environ Int. 2019 Feb;123:201-208. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2018.11.068. Epub 2018 Dec 6. Environ Int. 2019. PMID: 30530162 Free PMC article.
-
What e-cigarette factors determine oral epithelial DNA damage in consumers?Evid Based Dent. 2023 Dec;24(4):163-164. doi: 10.1038/s41432-023-00943-y. Epub 2023 Oct 12. Evid Based Dent. 2023. PMID: 37828109
-
Alterations in Vascular Function Associated With the Use of Combustible and Electronic Cigarettes.J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 May 5;9(9):e014570. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014570. Epub 2020 Apr 29. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020. PMID: 32345096 Free PMC article.
-
Cytotoxic and genotoxic effects of cigarette and waterpipe tobacco smoking on buccal mucosa: A systematic review and meta-analysis.J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2022 Oct-Dec;26(4):534-540. doi: 10.4103/jomfp.jomfp_292_22. Epub 2022 Dec 22. J Oral Maxillofac Pathol. 2022. PMID: 37082081 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Systematic review of biomarker findings from clinical studies of electronic cigarettes and heated tobacco products.Toxicol Rep. 2021 Jan 27;8:282-294. doi: 10.1016/j.toxrep.2021.01.014. eCollection 2021. Toxicol Rep. 2021. PMID: 33552927 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The Health Effects of Heated Tobacco Product Use-A Narrative Review.Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Aug 18;13(16):2042. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13162042. Healthcare (Basel). 2025. PMID: 40868658 Free PMC article. Review.
-
A Comparative Study on Genotoxic and Oxidative DNA Damage in Oral Epithelial Cells of COVID-19 Suspected Patients.Cureus. 2025 Apr 19;17(4):e82593. doi: 10.7759/cureus.82593. eCollection 2025 Apr. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40390722 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of Age, Hot Beverages and Tobacco Related Products on Buccal Epithelial Cells of Cigarette Smokers and non-Smokers in Ajman, UAE.Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024 Dec 1;25(12):4293-4298. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2024.25.12.4293. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2024. PMID: 39733421 Free PMC article.
-
E-Cigarette effects on oral health: A molecular perspective.Food Chem Toxicol. 2025 Feb;196:115216. doi: 10.1016/j.fct.2024.115216. Epub 2024 Dec 28. Food Chem Toxicol. 2025. PMID: 39736445 Review.
References
-
- Vukas J., Mallock-Ohnesorg N., Ruther T., Pieper E., Romano-Brandt L., Stoll Y., Hoehne L., Burgmann N., Laux P., Luch A., et al. Two Different Heated Tobacco Products vs. Cigarettes: Comparison of Nicotine Delivery and Subjective Effects in Experienced Users. Toxics. 2023;11:525. doi: 10.3390/toxics11060525. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources