Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Nov 16;8(1):21-29.
doi: 10.1002/ags3.12756. eCollection 2024 Jan.

Clinical characteristics and management of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma: A literature review

Affiliations
Review

Clinical characteristics and management of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma: A literature review

Yukinori Yamagata et al. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. .

Abstract

Retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is a rare tumor classified into many histological types. It is also often detected only after it has grown to a considerable size and requires extensive resection of the surrounding organs, making it difficult to offer optimal patient-tailored management. Evidence supporting specific treatment modalities for RPS is insufficient, owing to its rarity. The Japanese clinical practice guidelines for RPS were published in December 2021, with the aim of accumulating existing evidence and indicating the optimal practice for RPS. These guidelines provide important clinical questions (CQs) concerning the diagnosis and treatment of RPS. This review, with a particular focus on primary RPS, attempts to introduce clinical problems in the diagnosis and treatment of RPS and to assess those problems along with the CQs in the guidelines. According to these guidelines, although chemotherapy and radiotherapy are expected to have therapeutic effects, the level of evidence to support these treatments is not very high at present. Accordingly, complete resection of the tumor is the first and only option for managing primary RPS. However, as with other tumors, the demand for multidisciplinary treatment for RPS is increasing. These guidelines will undoubtedly represent a milestone in clinical practice in relation to RPS in the future, and further evidence is expected to be accumulated based on the CQs that have been proposed.

Keywords: resection; retroperitoneal sarcoma; treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest for this article.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Clinical algorithm for primary retroperitoneal sarcoma. CQ, clinical question.

References

    1. Tan MC, Brennan MF, Kuk D, Agaram NP, Antonescu CR, Qin LX, et al. Histology‐based classification predicts pattern of recurrence and improves risk stratification in primary retroperitoneal sarcoma. Ann Surg. 2016;263:593–600. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Trans‐Atlantic RPS Working Group . Management of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) in the adult: a consensus approach from the trans‐Atlantic RPS working group. Ann Surg Oncol. 2015;22:256–263. - PubMed
    1. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association . Japanese Orthopaedic association (JOA) clinical practice guidelines on the Management of Soft Tissue Tumors, 3rd edn. Nankodo. 2020. (Article in Japanese). - PubMed
    1. Japanese Association of Sarcoma Treatment and Research, Japan Society of Clinical Oncology . Clinical practice guidelines for retroperitoneal sarcoma. Igaku‐Tosho Syuppan. 2021. (Article in Japanese).
    1. Fletcher CDM, Bridge JA, Hogendoorn PCW, Mertens F, editors. WHO classification of Tumours of soft tissue and bone. WHO classification of Tumours. Vol 5. 4th ed. Lyon, France: IARC Publications; 2013.