Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Dec 22;11(1):8.
doi: 10.3390/vetsci11010008.

Characterizing and Eliminating the Inbreeding Load

Affiliations
Review

Characterizing and Eliminating the Inbreeding Load

István Nagy et al. Vet Sci. .

Abstract

The authors evaluated the relevant literature related to purging, which is the interaction between selection and inbreeding in which the population may eliminate its inbreeding load at least partially. According to the relevant literature, the inbreeding load and the process of purging were evaluated via pedigree methods based on ancestral inbreeding, the inbreeding-purging model, and expressed opportunity of purging, along with genomic methods. Most ancestral inbreeding-related studies were performed in zoos, where only a small proportion of the studied populations show signs of purging. The inbreeding-purging model was developed with Drosophila, and it was used to evaluate different zoo ungulates and Pannon white rabbits. Purging was detected in both studies. The expressed opportunity of purging was applied in Jersey cattle and Pannon white rabbits. In the Jersey cattle, it had an effect of 12.6% for fitness, while in the Pannon white rabbits, the inbreeding load was between 40% and 80% of its original value. The genomic studies also signalled purging, but they also made it clear that, contrary to the detected purging, the evaluated populations still suffered from inbreeding depression. Therefore, especially for domesticated animals, it can be concluded that deliberate inbreeding with the purpose of generating purging is not advocated.

Keywords: ancestral inbreeding; inbreeding–purging model; lethal equivalent; new inbreeding; old inbreeding; purged inbreeding coefficient; purging; purging coefficient.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Evolution of the different dam and litter inbreeding coefficients of the Pannon white rabbits (Wright: a,b; Ballou: c,d; Kalinowski: e,f; Kalinowski new: g,h) [61].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Evolution of the standard (F, red) and purged (g, green) inbreeding coefficients through time [45].
Figure 3
Figure 3
Evolution of the early survival [45] (large dots represent mean Ws, while small dots correspond to the mean value plus or minus one standard error).
Figure 4
Figure 4
The predicted fitness based on the Wright (F) and on the purged (g) inbreeding coefficients [94].

References

    1. Casellas J., Varona L., Ibanez-Escriche N., Quintanilla R., Noguera L. Skew distribution of founder-specific inbreeding depression effects on the longevity of Landrace sows. Genet. Res. 2009;90:499–508. doi: 10.1017/S0016672308009907. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sonesson A.K., Gjerde B., Meuwissen T.H.E. Truncation selection of BLUP-EBV and phenotypic values in fish breeding schemes. Aquaculture. 2005;243:61–68. doi: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2004.09.024. - DOI
    1. Henderson C.R. Best Linear Unbiased Estimation and Prediction under a selection model. Biometrics. 1975;31:423–447. doi: 10.2307/2529430. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sewalem A., Johansson K., Wilhelmson M., Lilipers K. Inbreeding and inbreeding depression on reproduction and production traits of White Leghorn lines selected for egg production traits. Brit. Poultry Sci. 1999;40:203–208. doi: 10.1080/00071669987601. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schäler J., Krüger B., Thaller G., Hinrichs D. Comparison of ancestral, partial, and genomic inbreeding in a local pig breed to achieve genetic diversity. Conserv. Genet. Resour. 2020;12:77–86. doi: 10.1007/s12686-018-1057-5. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources