Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2024 Mar 21;58(7):373-381.
doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2023-107563.

One-year effectiveness of high-load compared with low-load strengthening exercise on self-reported function in patients with hypermobile shoulders: a secondary analysis from a randomised controlled trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

One-year effectiveness of high-load compared with low-load strengthening exercise on self-reported function in patients with hypermobile shoulders: a secondary analysis from a randomised controlled trial

Behnam Liaghat et al. Br J Sports Med. .

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate the long-term effectiveness of high-load versus low-load strengthening exercise on self-reported function in patients with hypermobility spectrum disorder (HSD) and shoulder symptoms.

Methods: A secondary analysis of a superiority, parallel-group, randomised trial (balanced block randomisation 1:1, electronic concealment) including adult patients (n=100) from primary care with HSD and shoulder pain and/or instability ≥3 months. Patients received 16 weeks of shoulder exercises (three sessions/week): HEAVY (n=50, full-range, high-load, supervised twice/week) or LIGHT (n=50, neutral/mid-range, low-load, supervised three times in total). The 1-year between-group difference in change in self-reported function was measured using the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI, scale 0-2100, 0=best). Secondary outcomes were self-reported measures including changes in shoulder-related symptoms, function, emotions and lifestyle, quality of life, patient-perceived effect, treatment utility and adverse events. A blinded analyst conducted the analyses using linear mixed model repeated measurements analysis.

Results: One-year data were available in 86 out of 100 participants (79% women, mean age 37.8 years) (LIGHT 84%, HEAVY 88%). The mean WOSI score between-group difference favoured HEAVY (-92.9, 95% CI -257.4 to 71.5, p=0.268) but was not statistically significant. The secondary outcomes were mostly inconclusive, but patients in HEAVY had larger improvement in the WOSI emotions subdomain (-36.3; 95% CI -65.4 to -7.3, p=0.014). Patient-perceived effect favoured HEAVY anchored in WOSI-emotions (55% vs 31%, p=0.027) and WOSI-lifestyle (50% vs 29%, p=0.042).

Conclusion: High-load shoulder strengthening exercise was not superior to low-load strengthening exercise in improving self-reported function at 1 year. High-load strengthening exercise may be more effective in improving patient emotions about shoulder pain and function, but more robust data are needed to support these findings.

Trial registration number: NCT03869307.

Keywords: Exercise; Randomized Controlled Trial; Shoulder.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: STS is associate editor of Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, reports personal fees from Munksgaard, Nestlé Health Science and TrustMe-Ed, outside the submitted work, and being a co-founder of Good Life with osteoArthritis in Denmark (GLA:D). GLA:D is a non-profit initiative hosted at the University of Southern Denmark aimed at implementing clinical guidelines for osteoarthritis in clinical practice. JS reports receiving grants from Astra-Zeneca, outside the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) flow diagram. HEAVY, high-load strengthening exercise; LIGHT, low-load strengthening exercise. PP, per-protocol.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) total scores at baseline, 16 weeks and 1 year. The graph illustrates the results from the primary analysis, with data points representing means and error bars indicating 95% CIs. HEAVY, high-load strengthening exercise; LIGHT, low-load strengthening exercise.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Bar graph showing the number of participants in LIGHT and HEAVY with a clinically important change in WOSI-total score (minimal important difference: 252 points). HEAVY, high-load strengthening exercise; LIGHT, low-load strengthening exercise; WOSI, Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index (WOSI) subdomain scores at baseline, 16 weeks and 1 year. The graphs illustrate the results from the primary analysis, with data points representing means and error bars indicating 95% CIs. HEAVY, high-load strengthening exercise; LIGHT, low-load strengthening exercise.

References

    1. Remvig L, Jensen DV, Ward RC. Epidemiology of general joint Hypermobility and basis for the proposed criteria for benign joint Hypermobility syndrome: review of the literature. J Rheumatol 2007;34:804–9. - PubMed
    1. Akkaya KU, Burak M, Erturan S, et al. . An investigation of body awareness, fatigue, physical fitness, and musculoskeletal problems in young adults with Hypermobility spectrum disorder. Musculoskelet Sci Pract 2022;62:102642. 10.1016/j.msksp.2022.102642 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yew KS, Kamps-Schmitt KA, Borge R. Hypermobile Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and Hypermobility spectrum disorders. Am Fam Physician 2021;103:481–92. - PubMed
    1. Chopra P, Tinkle B, Hamonet C, et al. . Pain management in the Ehlers-Danlos syndromes. Am J Med Genet C Semin Med Genet 2017;175:212–9. 10.1002/ajmg.c.31554 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bates AV, McGregor A, Alexander CM. Adaptation of balance reactions following forward perturbations in people with joint Hypermobility syndrome. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2021;22:123. 10.1186/s12891-021-03961-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data