Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 9;14(2):211.
doi: 10.3390/ani14020211.

An Investigation of Meat Eating in Samples from Australia and Germany: The Role of Justifications, Perceptions, and Empathy

Affiliations

An Investigation of Meat Eating in Samples from Australia and Germany: The Role of Justifications, Perceptions, and Empathy

Katherine Northrope et al. Animals (Basel). .

Abstract

Despite concerns about animal welfare, and health and environmental issues associated with eating meat, meat consumption has continued to increase worldwide, including in Australia. One exception to this is Germany, with 2021 meat consumption levels being the lowest in the last 30 years. This pre-registered study investigated socio-cultural variables associated with meat consumption in Germany (n = 399) and Australia (n = 399) in a cross-sectional online survey. Participants reported levels of current and intended meat consumption, and they completed measures of speciesism, motivations to eat meat, empathy, animal farming perceptions, perceived behavioural control (PBC) over meat eating, and avoidance and dissociation regarding the animal origins of meat. In both Australia and Germany, enjoying the taste of meat positively predicted consumption and empathy towards farmed animals negatively predicted consumption. PBC was a strong positive predictor of intentions to reduce meat consumption in both countries. Empathy and liking the taste of meat were among the best predictors of red meat and poultry consumption, suggesting that interventions to reduce meat consumption may work best by targeting these factors while also increasing people's sense of control over their food choices.

Keywords: animals; culture; empathy; meat; taste; vegetarianism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Willett W., Rockström J., Loken B., Springmann M., Lang T., Vermeulen S., Garnett T., Tilman D., DeClerck F., Wood A., et al. Food in the Anthropocene: The EAT–Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems. Lancet. 2019;393:447–492. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31788-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Springmann M., Clark M.A., Rayner M., Scarborough P., Webb P. The global and regional costs of healthy and sustainable dietary patterns: A modelling study. Lancet Planet. Health. 2021;5:e797–e807. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00251-5. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aston L.M., Smith J.N., Powles J.W. Impact of a reduced red and processed meat dietary pattern on disease risks and greenhouse gas emissions in the UK: A modelling study. BMJ Open. 2012;2:e001072. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001072. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Xu X., Sharma P., Shu S., Lin T.-S., Ciais P., Tubiello F.N., Smith P., Campbell N., Jain A.K. Global greenhouse gas emissions from animal-based foods are twice those of plant-based foods. Nat. Food. 2021;2:724–732. doi: 10.1038/s43016-021-00358-x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ritchie H., Rosado P., Roser M. Meat and Dairy Production. [(accessed on 23 September 2023)]. Available online: https://ourworldindata.org/meat-production.

LinkOut - more resources