Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Dec 25;14(1):32.
doi: 10.3390/biom14010032.

Are Adenomyosis and Endometriosis Phenotypes of the Same Disease Process?

Affiliations
Review

Are Adenomyosis and Endometriosis Phenotypes of the Same Disease Process?

Marwan Habiba et al. Biomolecules. .

Abstract

In recent literature reviews, we concluded that the possibility that endometrial molecular aberrations are the sole or a necessary determinant of endometriosis and the Tissue Injury and Repair (TIAR) theory are yet to be convincingly proven. Here, we critically examine the theory that adenomyosis and endometriosis represent different phenotypes of a single disease. A common etiopathology for adenomyosis and endometriosis has been suggested because both conditions entail the presence of endometrial tissue at locations other than the lining of the uterus. There are wide differences in reported disease incidence and prevalence and, consequently, in estimates of the coexistence of both conditions. There are some similarities but also differences in their clinical features and predisposing factors. Each condition has a range of subtypes. These differences alone pose the question of whether subtypes of endometriosis and adenomyosis have different etiopathologies, and, in turn, this raises the question of whether they all share a common etiology. It is debatable whether the recognized differences between the eutopic endometrium in adenomyosis and endometriosis compared to those in unaffected women are the cause or the effect of the disease. The finding of common mutations, particularly of KRAS, lend support to the notion of shared predisposing factors, but this alone is insufficient evidence of causation.

Keywords: KRAS; adenomyosis; endometriosis; epidemiology; pathogenesis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(A) Wild type KRAS can hydrolyze a bound guanosine triphosphate (GTP) into guanosine diphosphate (GDP), but it requires binding of GTPase-activating proteins (GAP), which accelerates hydrolysis of KRAS-GTP to the inactive KRAS-GDP. (B) G12 mutation of KRAS renders it insensitive to GAP, leading to accumulation KRAS-GTP. In turn, this leads to enhanced activation of—amongst others—cell survival pathway. GEF: Guanine Nucleotide Exchange Factor, (X) indicates lack of binding, (P) phosphate.

References

    1. Guo S.W., Habiba M., Benagiano G. From Retrograde Menstruation to Endometrial Determinism and a Brave New World of “Root Treatment” of Endometriosis: Destiny or a Fanciful Utopia? Biomolecules. 2023;13:336. doi: 10.3390/biom13020336. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Habiba M., Benagiano G., Guo S.W. An Appraisal of the Tissue Injury and Repair (TIAR) Theory on the Pathogenesis of Endometriosis and Adenomyosis. Biomolecules. 2023;13:975. doi: 10.3390/biom13060975. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vinatier D., Cosson M., Dufour P. Is endometriosis an endometrial disease? Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol. 2000;91:113–125. doi: 10.1016/S0301-2115(99)00263-8. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leyendecker G., Kunz G., Noe M., Herbertz M., Mall G. Endometriosis: A dysfunction and disease of the archimetra. Hum. Reprod. Update. 1998;4:752–762. doi: 10.1093/humupd/4.5.752. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leyendecker G., Wildt L., Mall G. The pathophysiology of endometriosis and adenomyosis: Tissue injury and repair. Arch. Gynecol. Obstet. 2009;280:529–538. doi: 10.1007/s00404-009-1191-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types