Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jan 11;16(2):316.
doi: 10.3390/cancers16020316.

How to Integrate Prostate Cancer Biomarkers in Urology Clinical Practice: An Update

Affiliations
Review

How to Integrate Prostate Cancer Biomarkers in Urology Clinical Practice: An Update

Catalin Baston et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Nowadays, the management of prostate cancer has become more and more challenging due to the increasing number of available treatment options, therapeutic agents, and our understanding of its carcinogenesis and disease progression. Moreover, currently available risk stratification systems used to facilitate clinical decision-making have limitations, particularly in providing a personalized and patient-centered management strategy. Although prognosis and prostate cancer-specific survival have improved in recent years, the heterogenous behavior of the disease among patients included in the same risk prognostic group negatively impacts not only our clinical decision-making but also oncological outcomes, irrespective of the treatment strategy. Several biomarkers, along with available tests, have been developed to help clinicians in difficult decision-making scenarios and guide management strategies. In this review article, we focus on the scientific evidence that supports the clinical use of several biomarkers considered by professional urological societies (and included in uro-oncological guidelines) in the diagnosis process and specific difficult management strategies for clinically localized or advanced prostate cancer.

Keywords: biomarkers; clinical practice; individualized medicine; personalized medicine; prostate cancer genetics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Advancements in Biomarkers of Prostate Cancer: A Review.
    Agbetuyi-Tayo P, Gbadebo M, Rotimi OA, Rotimi SO. Agbetuyi-Tayo P, et al. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2024 Jan-Dec;23:15330338241290029. doi: 10.1177/15330338241290029. Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2024. PMID: 39440372 Free PMC article. Review.

References

    1. Siegel R.L., Miller K.D., Fuchs H.E., Jemal A. Cancer Statistics, 2021. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:7–33. doi: 10.3322/caac.21654. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wolf A.M.D., Wender R.C., Etzioni R.B., Thompson I.M., D’Amico A.V., Volk R.J., Brooks D.D., Dash C., Guessous I., Andrews K., et al. American Cancer Society Guideline for the Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Update 2010. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2010;60:70–98. doi: 10.3322/caac.20066. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fenton J.J., Weyrich M.S., Durbin S., Liu Y., Bang H., Melnikow J. Prostate-Specific Antigen-Based Screening for Prostate Cancer: Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA. 2018;319:1914–1931. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.3712. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Jemal A., Culp M.B., Ma J., Islami F., Fedewa S.A. Prostate Cancer Incidence 5 Years After US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendations Against Screening. J. Natl. Cancer Inst. 2021;113:64–71. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djaa068. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Van Poppel H., Roobol M.J., Chapple C.R., Catto J.W.F., N’Dow J., Sønksen J., Stenzl A., Wirth M. Prostate-Specific Antigen Testing as Part of a Risk-Adapted Early Detection Strategy for Prostate Cancer: European Association of Urology Position and Recommendations for 2021. Eur. Urol. 2021;80:703–711. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2021.07.024. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources