Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2023 Dec 30;11(1):51.
doi: 10.3390/children11010051.

Congenital Deafness and Deaf-Mutism: A Historical Perspective

Affiliations
Review

Congenital Deafness and Deaf-Mutism: A Historical Perspective

Andrea Cozza et al. Children (Basel). .

Abstract

Hearing loss is the most common sensory deficit and one of the most common congenital abnormalities. The estimated prevalence of moderate and severe hearing loss in a normal newborn is 0.1-0.3%, while the prevalence is 2-4% in newborns admitted to the newborn intensive care unit. Therefore, early detection and prompt treatment are of utmost importance in preventing the unwanted sequel of hearing loss on normal language development. The problem of congenital deafness is today addressed on the one hand with hearing screening at birth, on the other with the early (at around 3 months of age) application of hearing aids or, in case of lack of benefit, by the cochlear implant. Molecular genetics, antibody tests for some viruses, and diagnostic imaging have largely contributed to an effective etiological classification. A correct diagnosis and timely fitting of hearing aids or cochlear implants is useful for deaf children. The association between congenital deafness and "mutism", with all the consequences on/the consideration that deaf mutes have had since ancient times, not only from a social point of view but also from a legislative point of view, continued until the end of the nineteenth century, with the development on one side of new methods for the rehabilitation of language and on the other of sign language. But we need to get to the last decades of the last century to have, on the one hand, the diffusion of "universal newborn hearing screening", the discovery of the genetic causes of over half of congenital deafness, and on the other hand the cochlear implants that have allowed thousands of children born deaf the development of normal speech. Below, we will analyze the evolution of the problem between deafness and deaf-mutism over the centuries, with particular attention to the nineteenth century.

Keywords: audiology history; congenital deafness; deafmutism; otology history.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lanza D., Vegetti M., editors. Aristotele, Opere Biologiche. 2nd ed. UTET; Torino, Italy: 1996. p. 278.
    1. Eulenburg A. Real-Encyklopädie der Gesammten Heilkunde. Medizinisch-Chirurgisches Handwörterbuch für Prakti-Sche Ärzte, Vols. XII Scorbuto-Stomacace. Urban & Schwarzenberg; Wien und Leipzig, Germany: 1886. pp. 498–533.
    1. Thompson D.C., McPhillips H. Universal newborn hearing screening: Summary of evidence. JAMA. 2001;286:2000–2010. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.16.2000. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Faistauer M., Silva A.L. Does universal newborn hearing screening impact the timing of deafness treatment? J. Pediatr. 2022;98:147–154. doi: 10.1016/j.jped.2021.04.008. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lieu J.E.C., Kenna M. Hearing Loss in Children: A Review. JAMA. 2020;324:2195–2205. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.17647. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources