Non-Invasive Ventilation for Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Outcomes and Predictors of Failure from an ICU Cohort
- PMID: 38256342
- PMCID: PMC10821344
- DOI: 10.3390/medicina60010081
Non-Invasive Ventilation for Community-Acquired Pneumonia: Outcomes and Predictors of Failure from an ICU Cohort
Abstract
Background and Objectives: The use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) remains controversial. NIV failure in the setting of acute hypoxemic respiratory failure is associated with increased mortality, highlighting the need for careful patient selection. Methods and Methods: This is a retrospective observational cohort study. We included 140 patients with severe CAP, treated with either NIV or invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) as their primary oxygenation strategy. Results: The median PaO2/FiO2 ratio and SOFA score upon ICU admission were 151 mmHg and 6, respectively. We managed 76% of patients with NIV initially and report an NIV success rate of 59%. Overall, the 28-day mortality was 25%, whilst for patients with NIV success, the mortality was significantly lower at 13%. In the univariate analysis, NIV failure was associated with the SOFA score (OR 1.33), the HACOR score (OR 1.14) and the presence of septic shock (OR 3.99). The SOFA score has an AUC of 0.75 for NIV failure upon ICU admission, whilst HACOR has an AUC of 0.76 after 2 h of NIV. Conclusions: Our results suggest that a SOFA ≤ 4 and an HACOR ≤ 5 are reasonable thresholds to identify patients with severe CAP likely to benefit from NIV.
Keywords: HACOR; NIV; SOFA; non-invasive ventilation; pneumonia; respiratory failure.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures



References
-
- GBD 2016 Lower Respiratory Infections Collaborators Estimates of the Global, Regional, and National Morbidity, Mortality, and Aetiologies of Lower Respiratory Infections in 195 Countries, 1990–2016: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Infect. Dis. 2018;18:1191–1210. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(18)30310-4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Shah H., ElSaygh J., Raheem A., Yousuf M.A., Nguyen L.H., Nathani P.S., Sharma V., Theli A., Desai M.K., Moradiya D.V., et al. Utilization Trends and Predictors of Non-Invasive and Invasive Ventilation During Hospitalization Due to Community-Acquired Pneumonia. Cureus. 2021;13:e17954. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17954. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- de Miguel-Díez J., Jiménez-García R., Hernández-Barrera V., Puente-Maestu L., Ji Z., de Miguel-Yanes J.M., Méndez-Bailón M., López-de-Andrés A. Ventilatory Support Use in Hospitalized Patients with Community-Acquired Pneumonia. Fifteen-Year Trends in Spain (2001–2015) Arch. Bronconeumol. 2020;56:792–800. doi: 10.1016/j.arbres.2019.12.008. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Schnell D., Timsit J.-F., Darmon M., Vesin A., Goldgran-Toledano D., Dumenil A.-S., Garrouste-Orgeas M., Adrie C., Bouadma L., Planquette B., et al. Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation in Acute Respiratory Failure: Trends in Use and Outcomes. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40:582–591. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3222-y. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lim W.S., Baudouin S.V., George R.C., Hill A.T., Jamieson C., Le Jeune I., Macfarlane J.T., Read R.C., Roberts H.J., Levy M.L., et al. BTS Guidelines for the Management of Community Acquired Pneumonia in Adults: Update 2009. Thorax. 2009;64((Suppl. S3)):iii1–iii55. doi: 10.1136/thx.2009.121434. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous