Clinical and Radiologic Analysis of Minimally Invasive Anterior-Posterior Combined Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity: Comparison of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at L5/S1 (OLIF51) versus Transforaminal Interbody Fusion
- PMID: 38256368
- PMCID: PMC10820572
- DOI: 10.3390/medicina60010107
Clinical and Radiologic Analysis of Minimally Invasive Anterior-Posterior Combined Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity: Comparison of Oblique Lateral Interbody Fusion at L5/S1 (OLIF51) versus Transforaminal Interbody Fusion
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Although adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery brought about improvement in the quality of life of patients, it is accompanied by high invasiveness and several complications. Specifically, mechanical complications of rod fracture, instrumentation failures, and pseudarthrosis are still unsolved issues. To better improve these problems, oblique lateral interbody fusion at L5/S1 (OLIF51) was introduced in 2015 at my institution. The objective of this study was to compare the clinical and radiologic outcomes of anterior-posterior combined surgery for ASD between the use of OLIF51 and transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) at L5/S1. Materials and Methods: A total of 117 ASD patients received anterior-posterior correction surgeries either with the use of OLIF51 (35 patients) or L5/S1 TLIF (82 patients). In both groups, L1-5 OLIF and minimally invasive posterior procedures of hybrid or circumferential MIS were employed. The sagittal and coronal spinal alignment and spino-pelvic parameters were recorded preoperatively and at follow-up. The quality-of-life parameters and visual analogue scale were evaluated, as well as surgical complications at follow-up. Results: The average follow-up period was thirty months (13-84). The number of average fused segments was eight (4-12). The operation time and estimated blood loss were significantly lower in OLIF51 than in TLIF. The PI-LL mismatch, LLL, L5/S1 segmental lordosis, and L5 coronal tilt were significantly better in OLIF51 than TLIF. The complication rate was statistically equivalent between the two groups. Conclusions: The introduction of OLIF51 for adult spine deformity surgery led to a decrease in operation time and estimated blood loss, as well as improvement in sagittal and coronal correction compared to TLIF. The circumferential MIS correction and fusion with OLIF51 serve as an effective surgical modality which can be applied to many cases of adult spinal deformity.
Keywords: OLIF51; adult spinal deformity; minimally invasive surgery; oblique lateral interbody fusion; transforaminal interbody fusion.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Correction of marked sagittal deformity with circumferential minimally invasive surgery using oblique lateral interbody fusion in adult spinal deformity.J Orthop Surg Res. 2020 Jan 15;15(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s13018-020-1545-7. J Orthop Surg Res. 2020. PMID: 31941529 Free PMC article.
-
Utility of multilevel lateral interbody fusion of the thoracolumbar coronal curve apex in adult deformity surgery in combination with open posterior instrumentation and L5-S1 interbody fusion: a case-matched evaluation of 32 patients.J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Feb;26(2):208-219. doi: 10.3171/2016.8.SPINE151543. Epub 2016 Oct 21. J Neurosurg Spine. 2017. PMID: 27767682
-
Single-level controlled comparison of OLIF51 and percutaneous screw in lateral position versus MIS-TLIF for lumbosacral degenerative disorders: Clinical and radiologic study.J Orthop Sci. 2021 Sep;26(5):756-764. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2020.08.005. Epub 2020 Sep 12. J Orthop Sci. 2021. PMID: 32933834
-
Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus oblique lateral interbody fusion for lumbar degenerative disease: a meta-analysis.BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021 Sep 18;22(1):802. doi: 10.1186/s12891-021-04687-7. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2021. PMID: 34537023 Free PMC article.
-
Two- and three-year outcomes of minimally invasive and hybrid correction of adult spinal deformity.J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Nov 5;36(4):595-608. doi: 10.3171/2021.7.SPINE21138. Print 2022 Apr 1. J Neurosurg Spine. 2021. PMID: 34740175 Review.
Cited by
-
Anterior Versus Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 in Hybrid Surgery for Adult Spinal Deformity: A Propensity Score Matching Analysis of Radiographic Results, Mechanical Complications, and Clinical Outcomes.J Clin Med. 2025 Feb 20;14(5):1431. doi: 10.3390/jcm14051431. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40094860 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Pellisé F., Vila-Casademunt A., Ferrer M., Domingo-Sàbat M., Bagó J., Pérez-Grueso F.J.S., Alanay A., Mannion A.F., Acaroglu E. Impact on health related quality of life of adult spinal deformity (ASD) compared with other chronic conditions. Eur. Spine J. 2015;24:3–11. doi: 10.1007/s00586-014-3542-1. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Bess S., Line B., Fu K.M., McCarthy I., Lafage V., Schwab F., Shaffrey C., Ames C., Akbarnia B., Jo H., et al. The health impact of symptomatic adult spinal deformity: Comparison of deformity types to united states population norms and chronic diseases. Spine. 2016;41:224–233. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001202. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Acaroglu E., Yavuz A.C., Guler U.O., Yuksel S., Yavuz Y., Domingo-Sabat M., Pellise F., Alanay A., Perez Grueso F.S., Kleinstück F., et al. A decision analysis to identify the ideal treatment for adult spinal deformity: Is surgery better than non-surgical treatment in improving health-related quality of life and decreasing the disease burden? Eur. Spine J. 2016;25:2390–2400. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4413-8. - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous