Investigating the Association of Assisted Reproduction Techniques and Adverse Perinatal Outcomes
- PMID: 38256462
- PMCID: PMC10816234
- DOI: 10.3390/jcm13020328
Investigating the Association of Assisted Reproduction Techniques and Adverse Perinatal Outcomes
Abstract
Background: Infertility affects about 80 million individuals worldwide and 10-15% of couples at reproductive age will seek medical assistance. There is increasing evidence that pregnancies after Assisted Reproduction Techniques (ART) are associated with pre-term birth, low birthweight, congenital defects, and increased mortality rates. The aim of this review is to assess all the published literature and provide an updated review on the effect of assisted conception and perinatal and neonatal outcomes.
Methods: Comprehensive research on Pubmed/Medline, Scopus, and Google scholar electronic databases was conducted from July 2023 up to September 2023, using the terms assisted reproductive techniques, ART, in vitro fertilization, IVF, intracytoplasmic sperm injection, ICSI, preterm birth, PTB, low birth weight, LBW, chromosomal defects, congenital defects, and hypospadias. In total, 87 full text articles were retrieved and after a careful evaluation, 31 studies were selected for data extraction.
Results: Our review demonstrated a higher risk of congenital and chromosomal defects, and a higher incidence of male genital tract defects and heart defects in ART pregnancies. Regarding pre-term birth, our results were contradictory.
Conclusions: Although assisted reproduction techniques are associated with increased risks, they are safe regarding perinatal outcomes and couples should not be discouraged from utilizing them. Our results aim to alert clinicians to these specific outcomes and offer more personalized care and counseling to infertile couples and their children.
Keywords: assisted reproduction techniques; congenital anomalies; genital defects; heart defects; perinatal outcome; pre-term birth.
Conflict of interest statement
Author Antonios Sfakianakis was employed by the company “London Women’s Clinic” based in the United Kingdom. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Kupka M.S., Ferraretti A.P., de Mouzon J., Erb K., D’Hooghe T., Castilla J.A., Calhaz-Jorge C., De Geyter C., Goossens V., Strohmer H., et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2010: Results generated from European registers by ESHREdagger. Hum. Reprod. 2014;29:2099–2113. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu175. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Banker M., Dyer S., Chambers G.M., Ishihara O., Kupka M., de Mouzon J., Zegers-Hochschild F., Adamson G.D. International Committee for Monitoring Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ICMART): World report on assisted reproductive technologies, 2013. Fertil. Steril. 2021;116:741–756. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.03.039. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
