Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jan 10;24(2):431.
doi: 10.3390/s24020431.

Recent Trends in Chemical Sensors for Detecting Toxic Materials

Affiliations
Review

Recent Trends in Chemical Sensors for Detecting Toxic Materials

Yeonhong Kim et al. Sensors (Basel). .

Abstract

Industrial development has led to the widespread production of toxic materials, including carcinogenic, mutagenic, and toxic chemicals. Even with strict management and control measures, such materials still pose threats to human health. Therefore, convenient chemical sensors are required for toxic chemical monitoring, such as optical, electrochemical, nanomaterial-based, and biological-system-based sensors. Many existing and new chemical sensors have been developed, as well as new methods based on novel technologies for detecting toxic materials. The emergence of material sciences and advanced technologies for fabrication and signal-transducing processes has led to substantial improvements in the sensing elements for target recognition and signal-transducing elements for reporting interactions between targets and sensing elements. Many excellent reviews have effectively summarized the general principles and applications of different types of chemical sensors. Therefore, this review focuses on chemical sensor advancements in terms of the sensing and signal-transducing elements, as well as more recent achievements in chemical sensors for toxic material detection. We also discuss recent trends in biosensors for the detection of toxic materials.

Keywords: biosensor; chemical optical sensor; electrochemical sensor; nanomaterial; toxic material; transcription factor.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Types of chemical sensors based on sensing and transducing elements.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The types of biosensors based on ability to transduce signals into digitized values.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Ukaogo P.O., Ewuzie U., Onwuka C.V. Microorganisms for Sustainable Environment and Health. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2020. Environmental pollution: Causes, effects, and the remedies; pp. 419–429.
    1. Ajibade F.O., Adelodun B., Lasisi K.H., Fadare O.O., Ajibade T.F., Nwogwu N.A., Sulaymon I.D., Ugya A.Y., Wang H.C., Wang A. Microbe Mediated Remediation of Environmental Contaminants. Elsevier; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2021. Environmental pollution and their socioeconomic impacts; pp. 321–354.
    1. Young S., Balluz L., Malilay J. Natural and technologic hazardous material releases during and after natural disasters: A review. Sci. Total Environ. 2004;322:3–20. doi: 10.1016/S0048-9697(03)00446-7. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Corn M. Handbook of Hazardous Materials. Academic Press; New York, NY, USA: 2012.
    1. Ha S., Seidle T., Lim K.-M. Act on the Registration and Evaluation of Chemicals (K-REACH) and replacement, reduction or refinement best practices. Environ. Health Toxicol. 2016;31:e2016026. doi: 10.5620/eht.e2016026. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources