Parenteral Vaccination with a Live Brucella melitensis Mutant Protects against Wild-Type B. melitensis 16M Challenge
- PMID: 38257995
- PMCID: PMC10820470
- DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms12010169
Parenteral Vaccination with a Live Brucella melitensis Mutant Protects against Wild-Type B. melitensis 16M Challenge
Abstract
Susceptibility to brucellosis remains prevalent, even in herds vaccinated with conventional vaccines. Efforts are underway to develop an improved brucellosis vaccine, and possibly a universal vaccine, given that Brucella species are highly homologous. To this end, two B. melitensis mutants were developed, znBM-lacZ (znBMZ) and znBM-mCherry (znBM-mC), and were tested for their ability to confer systemic immunity against virulent B. melitensis challenge. To assess the extent of their attenuation, bone-marrow-derived macrophages and human TF-1 myeloid cells were infected with both mutants, and the inability to replicate within these cells was noted. Mice infected with varying doses of znBM-mC cleared the brucellae within 6-10 weeks. To test for efficacy against systemic disease, groups of mice were vaccinated once by the intraperitoneal route with either znBMZ or B. abortus S19 vaccine. Relative to the PBS-dosed mice, znBMZ vaccination greatly reduced splenic brucellae colonization by ~25,000-fold compared to 700-fold for S19-vaccinated mice. Not surprisingly, both znBMZ and S19 strains induced IFN-γ+ CD4+ T cells, yet only znBMZ induced IFN-γ+ CD8+ T cells. While both strains induced CD4+ effector memory T cells (Tems), only znBMZ induced CD8+ Tems. Thus, these results show that the described znBM mutants are safe, able to elicit CD4+ and CD8+ T cell immunity without a boost, and highly effective, rendering them promising vaccine candidates for livestock.
Keywords: Brucella; IFN-γ; T cells; TNF-α; vaccine.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures






Similar articles
-
Live mucosal vaccination stimulates potent protection via varied CD4+ and CD8+ T cell subsets against wild-type Brucella melitensis 16M challenge.Front Immunol. 2022 Oct 3;13:995327. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.995327. eCollection 2022. Front Immunol. 2022. PMID: 36263034 Free PMC article.
-
A Single Nasal Dose Vaccination with a Brucella abortus Mutant Potently Protects against Pulmonary Infection.J Immunol. 2023 May 15;210(10):1576-1588. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.2300071. J Immunol. 2023. PMID: 37036290 Free PMC article.
-
Nasal vaccination stimulates CD8(+) T cells for potent protection against mucosal Brucella melitensis challenge.Immunol Cell Biol. 2016 May;94(5):496-508. doi: 10.1038/icb.2016.5. Epub 2016 Jan 11. Immunol Cell Biol. 2016. PMID: 26752510 Free PMC article.
-
Protective live oral brucellosis vaccines stimulate Th1 and th17 cell responses.Infect Immun. 2011 Oct;79(10):4165-74. doi: 10.1128/IAI.05080-11. Epub 2011 Jul 18. Infect Immun. 2011. PMID: 21768283 Free PMC article.
-
A review of three decades of use of the cattle brucellosis rough vaccine Brucella abortus RB51: myths and facts.BMC Vet Res. 2023 Oct 18;19(1):211. doi: 10.1186/s12917-023-03773-3. BMC Vet Res. 2023. PMID: 37853407 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
A case of polycystic kidney disease infection caused by Brucella: report and literature review.Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 10;12:1613953. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1613953. eCollection 2025. Front Med (Lausanne). 2025. PMID: 40708629 Free PMC article.
References
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous