Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 15;12(1):169.
doi: 10.3390/microorganisms12010169.

Parenteral Vaccination with a Live Brucella melitensis Mutant Protects against Wild-Type B. melitensis 16M Challenge

Affiliations

Parenteral Vaccination with a Live Brucella melitensis Mutant Protects against Wild-Type B. melitensis 16M Challenge

Xinghong Yang et al. Microorganisms. .

Abstract

Susceptibility to brucellosis remains prevalent, even in herds vaccinated with conventional vaccines. Efforts are underway to develop an improved brucellosis vaccine, and possibly a universal vaccine, given that Brucella species are highly homologous. To this end, two B. melitensis mutants were developed, znBM-lacZ (znBMZ) and znBM-mCherry (znBM-mC), and were tested for their ability to confer systemic immunity against virulent B. melitensis challenge. To assess the extent of their attenuation, bone-marrow-derived macrophages and human TF-1 myeloid cells were infected with both mutants, and the inability to replicate within these cells was noted. Mice infected with varying doses of znBM-mC cleared the brucellae within 6-10 weeks. To test for efficacy against systemic disease, groups of mice were vaccinated once by the intraperitoneal route with either znBMZ or B. abortus S19 vaccine. Relative to the PBS-dosed mice, znBMZ vaccination greatly reduced splenic brucellae colonization by ~25,000-fold compared to 700-fold for S19-vaccinated mice. Not surprisingly, both znBMZ and S19 strains induced IFN-γ+ CD4+ T cells, yet only znBMZ induced IFN-γ+ CD8+ T cells. While both strains induced CD4+ effector memory T cells (Tems), only znBMZ induced CD8+ Tems. Thus, these results show that the described znBM mutants are safe, able to elicit CD4+ and CD8+ T cell immunity without a boost, and highly effective, rendering them promising vaccine candidates for livestock.

Keywords: Brucella; IFN-γ; T cells; TNF-α; vaccine.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Two recombinant strains, ∆znuAnorD B. melitensis-lacZ (znBMZ) and ∆znuAnorD B. melitensis-mCherry (znBM-mC), show reduced growth in (A) primary mouse bone-marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs) and (B) human TF-1 myeloid cells. (A) Wild-type (wt) B. melitensis 16M (BM 16M), B. melitensis Rev 1 vaccine, znBMZ, and znBM-mC were used to infect BMDMs (1 × 104/well) at a bacteria-to-macrophage ratio of 10:1. Primary BMDMs were derived from BALB/c mouse femurs and recovered BMDMs were found to be >96% CD11b+ F4/80+. After a 3-h incubation followed by a 30 min treatment with 50 μg/mL gentamicin to rid extracellular brucellae, infected BMDMs were incubated in fresh medium for 0, 24, 48, or 72 h. Infected macrophages were water-lysed, and supernatants were diluted for CFU enumeration on potato infusion agar (PIA). The level of initial infection was the same for all Brucella strains (t = 0 h). The results show that both znBMZ and znBM-mC were unable to achieve the level of colonization as the wt BM 16M strain or B. melitensis Rev 1 vaccine. (B) Human TF-1 myeloid cells (1 × 104/well) were infected 10:1 with wt BM 16M, B. melitensis Rev 1 vaccine, znBMZ, or znBM-mC, and evaluated for colonization as described above. The results showed that both znBMZ and znBM-mC were unable to achieve the same level of colonization as wt BM 16M or Rev 1. Values are the means of triplicate wells ± SEM: *** p ≤ 0.002; differences in brucellae colonization by the same strain over time vs. t = 0; ### p ≤ 0.001; differences in brucellae colonization vs. wt BM 16M at the same time point; and §§ p < 0.01, §§§ p < 0.001 differences in brucellae colonization vs. BM Rev 1 vaccine.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The Brucella mutant, znBM-mC, is attenuated since it is effectively cleared from mice following intraperitoneal (IP) delivery. BALB/c mice (4–7/group/time point) were IP vaccinated with 1 × 106 CFUs of B. abortus S19 or with the indicated dose of znBM-mC (105, 106, or 107 CFUs). At 3, 6, and 10 weeks (wks) after vaccination, individual spleens were assessed for (A) brucellae colonization and (B) splenic weights. Values are the mean CFUs or weights from individual mice ± SEM; *** p < 0.001, ** p ≤ 0.02, * p < 0.05 differences vs. S19 colonization at the specific time point; ## p = 0.018 between mice dosed with 105 or 106 CFUs of znBM-mC at 6 wks post-infection.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A single IP vaccination with znBMZ protects mice against wt Brucella colonization. Groups of BALB/c mice were IP vaccinated with sterile PBS vehicle (n = 4), 107 CFUs S19 (n = 7), or 107 CFUs znBMZ (n = 6) on day 0. On day 42, all mice were challenged IP with 5 × 104 CFUs wt BM 16M. Spleens from individual mice were harvested and evaluated (A) for brucellae colonization on PIA plates with X-gal and (B) for individual weights. Values are the mean CFUs or weights from individual mice ± SEM; *** p < 0.001, ** p ≤ 0.01, differences vs. PBS-treated mice; ††† p < 0.001 vs. S19-vaccinated mice.
Figure 4
Figure 4
IP vaccination with znBMZ induces CD4+ and CD8+ T effector memory cells (Tems). Groups of BALB/c mice were IP vaccinated with sterile PBS vehicle (n = 5), 107 CFUs S19 (n = 5), or 107 CFUs znBMZ (n = 5) on day 0. On day 42, spleens from individual mice were harvested and mononuclear cells were isolated for evaluation T cell subsets by flow cytometry. (A) Flow cytometry plots reveal that S19-vaccinated mice elicit mostly CD4+ T cells in contrast to both CD4+ and CD8+ T cells induced with subsequent znBMZ vaccination. (B) Total CD4+ and (C) CD8+ T cells are depicted. The frequencies of (D) CD4+ and (F) CD8+ T cells were evaluated for induction of Tems by staining splenic lymphocytes for CD44High CD62Low CX3CR1+ KLRG1+ T cells and (E) total CD4+ and (G) CD8+ Tems were quantified. Values are the mean total T cells and Tems from individual mice ± SEM; *** p < 0.001, differences vs. PBS-treated mice; ††† p < 0.001 vs. S19-vaccinated mice.
Figure 5
Figure 5
IP vaccination with znBMZ induces IFN-γ-producing CD4+ and CD8+ T cells. The spleens from the same groups of mice evaluated in Figure 4 were further analyzed for IFN-γ+ T cells by flow cytometry. (A) Gating on CD4+ Tems, these were further analyzed for expression of IFN-γ. (B) The total number of IFN-γ+ CD4+ T cells and (C) IFN-γ+ Tems are depicted. (D) Gating on CD8+ Tems, these were further analyzed for expression of IFN-γ. (E) The total number of IFN-γ+ CD8+ T cells and (F) IFN-γ+ Tems are shown. Values are the mean total CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and CD4+ and CD8+ Tems from individual mice ± SEM; *** p < 0.001, ** p ≤ 0.002, * p < 0.05 differences vs. PBS-treated mice; ††† p < 0.001, †† p ≤ 0.002 vs. S19-vaccinated mice.
Figure 6
Figure 6
A single IP vaccination with S19 or znBMZ elicits increased splenic IFN-γ and TNF-α, but no IL-17 following in vitro restimulation. Isolated splenic mononuclear cells from individual mice, described in Figure 4 and Figure 5, were restimulated in vitro with media or 109 CFUs HKRB51 for three days. Harvested supernatants from duplicate cultures were analyzed for (A) IFN-γ, (B) TNF-α, and (C) IL-17. Values are the mean cytokines from duplicate cultures corrected for media only levels from individual mice ± SEM; *** p < 0.001, differences vs. PBS-treated mice; ††† p < 0.001 vs. S19-vaccinated mice.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Whatmore A.M., Foster J.T. Emerging diversity and ongoing expansion of the genus Brucella. Infect. Genet. Evol. 2021;92:104865. doi: 10.1016/j.meegid.2021.104865. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Roop R.M., 2nd, Barton I.S., Hopersberger D., Martin D.W. Uncovering the Hidden Credentials of Brucella Virulence. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 2021;85:e00021-19. doi: 10.1128/MMBR.00021-19. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Poester F.P., Samartino L.E., Santos R.L. Pathogenesis and pathobiology of brucellosis in livestock. Rev. Sci. Tech. 2013;32:105–115. doi: 10.20506/rst.32.1.2193. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Olsen S.C., Palmer M.V. Advancement of knowledge of Brucella over the past 50 years. Vet. Pathol. 2014;51:1076–1089. doi: 10.1177/0300985814540545. - DOI - PubMed
    1. de Figueiredo P., Ficht T.A., Rice-Ficht A., Rossetti C.A., Adams L.G. Pathogenesis and Immunobiology of Brucellosis. Am. J. Pathol. 2015;185:1505–1517. doi: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.03.003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed