Perspectives on genetic studies of type 2 diabetes from the genome-wide association studies era to precision medicine
- PMID: 38259175
- PMCID: PMC10981147
- DOI: 10.1111/jdi.14149
Perspectives on genetic studies of type 2 diabetes from the genome-wide association studies era to precision medicine
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have facilitated a substantial and rapid increase in the number of confirmed genetic susceptibility variants for complex diseases. Approximately 700 variants predisposing individuals to the risk for type 2 diabetes have been identified through GWAS until 2023. From 2018 to 2022, hundreds of type 2 diabetes susceptibility loci with smaller effect sizes were identified through large-scale GWAS with sample sizes of 200,000 to >1 million. The clinical translation of genetic information for type 2 diabetes includes the development of novel therapeutics and risk predictions. Although drug discovery based on loci identified in GWAS remains challenging owing to the difficulty of functional annotation, global efforts have been made to identify novel biological mechanisms and therapeutic targets by applying multi-omics approaches or searching for disease-associated coding variants in isolated founder populations. Polygenic risk scores (PRSs), comprising up to millions of associated variants, can identify individuals with higher disease risk than those in the general population. In populations of European descent, PRSs constructed from base GWAS data with a sample size of approximately 450,000 have predicted the onset of diseases well. However, European GWAS-derived PRSs have limited predictive performance in non-European populations. The predictive accuracy of a PRS largely depends on the sample size of the base GWAS data. The results of GWAS meta-analyses for multi-ethnic groups as base GWAS data and cross-population polygenic prediction methodology have been applied to establish a universal PRS applicable to small isolated ethnic populations.
Keywords: Genome‐wide association studies; Polygenic risk scores; Type 2 diabetes.
© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Diabetes Investigation published by Asian Association for the Study of Diabetes (AASD) and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- IDF Atlas 10th edition. Available from: https://diabetesatlas.org/ Accessed October 11, 2023.
-
- Poulsen P, Kyvik KO, Vaag A, et al. Heritability of type II (non‐insulin‐dependent) diabetes mellitus and abnormal glucose tolerance—a population‐based twin study. Diabetologia 1999; 42: 139–145. - PubMed
-
- Groop L, Forsblom C, Lehtovirta M, et al. Metabolic consequences of a family history of NIDDM (the Botnia study): Evidence for sex‐specific parental effects. Diabetes 1996; 45: 1585–1593. - PubMed
-
- Almgren P, Lehtovirta M, Isomaa B, et al. Heritability and familiality of type 2 diabetes and related quantitative traits in the Botnia study. Diabetologia 2011; 54: 2811–2819. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
