Three-dimensional Liver Model Application for Liver Transplantation
- PMID: 38259179
- DOI: 10.1097/TP.0000000000004730
Three-dimensional Liver Model Application for Liver Transplantation
Abstract
Background: Children are removed from the liver transplant waitlist because of death or progressive illness. Size mismatch accounts for 30% of organ refusal. This study aimed to demonstrate that 3-dimensional (3D) technology is a feasible and accurate adjunct to organ allocation and living donor selection process.
Methods: This prospective multicenter study included pediatric liver transplant candidates and living donors from January 2020 to February 2023. Patient-specific, 3D-printed liver models were used for anatomic planning, real-time evaluation during organ procurement, and surgical navigation. The primary outcome was to determine model accuracy. The secondary outcome was to determine the impact of outcomes in living donor hepatectomy. Study groups were analyzed using propensity score matching with a retrospective cohort.
Results: Twenty-eight recipients were included. The median percentage error was -0.6% for 3D models and had the highest correlation to the actual liver explant (Pearson's R = 0.96, P < 0.001) compared with other volume calculation methods. Patient and graft survival were comparable. From 41 living donors, the median percentage error of the allograft was 12.4%. The donor-matched study group had lower central line utilization (21.4% versus 75%, P = 0.045), shorter length of stay (4 versus 7 d, P = 0.003), and lower mean comprehensive complication index (3 versus 21, P = 0.014).
Conclusions: Three-dimensional volume is highly correlated with actual liver explant volume and may vary across different allografts for living donation. The addition of 3D-printed liver models during the transplant evaluation and organ procurement process is a feasible and safe adjunct to the perioperative decision-making process.
Copyright © 2023 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
-
- Hsu EK, Shaffer ML, Gao L, et al. Analysis of liver offers to pediatric candidates on the transplant wait list. Gastroenterology. 2017;153:988–995.
-
- Jimenez-Rivera C, Nightingale S, Benchimol EI, et al. Outcomes in infants listed for liver transplantation: a retrospective cohort study using the United Network for Organ Sharing database. Pediatr Transplant. 2016;20:904–911.
-
- Arnon R, Annunziato R, Miloh T, et al. Liver transplantation in children weighing 5 kg or less: analysis of the UNOS database: liver transplantation below 5 kg. Pediatr Transplant. 2011;15:650–658.
-
- Magee JC, Krishnan SM, Benfield MR, et al. Pediatric transplantation in the United States, 1997–2006. Am J Transplant. 2008;8:935–945.
-
- Kwong AJ, Ebel NH, Kim WR, et al. OPTN/SRTR 2020 annual data report: liver. Am J Transplant. 2022;22:204–309.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical