Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Mar 1;45(3):204-214.
doi: 10.1097/MAO.0000000000004095. Epub 2024 Jan 17.

A Systematic Review of Cochlear Implant-Related Magnetic Resonance Imaging Artifact: Implications for Clinical Imaging

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

A Systematic Review of Cochlear Implant-Related Magnetic Resonance Imaging Artifact: Implications for Clinical Imaging

Joseph M Berry et al. Otol Neurotol. .

Abstract

Objective: To conduct a systematic review of the existing literature with the aim of evaluating and consolidating the present understanding of strategies for mitigating magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) artifacts related to cochlear implants in adult and pediatric patients, covering both in-vivo and ex-vivo investigations.

Data sources: A systematic review of MEDLINE-Ovid, Embase, Google Scholar, The Cochrane Library, and Scopus was performed from inception through April 2022. The protocol was registered with PROSPERO before commencement of data collection (CRD CRD42022319651).

Review methods: The data were screened and collected by two authors independently, and eligibility was assessed according to Cochrane Handbook and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis recommendations, whereas the quality of the articles was evaluated using the NIH Study Quality Assessment.

Results: The search yielded 2,354 potentially relevant articles, of which 27 studies were included in the final review. Twelve studies looked at 1.5-T MRI, four studies looked at 3-T MRI, eight studies looked at both 1.5 and 3 T, one study looked at 0.2 and 1.5 T, and one study looked at 3- and 7.0-T MRI. Nineteen studies focused on MRI sequences as a means of artifact reduction, nine studies focused on implant magnet positioning, two studies focused on head positioning, and one study focused on both magnet and head positioning. In terms of MRI sequences, diffusion-weighted imaging produced larger artifacts compared with other sequences, whereas fast spin echo/turbo spin echo sequences and fat suppression techniques produced smaller artifacts. The position of the magnet was also found to be important, with a magnet position more than 6.5 cm posterior to the external auditory canal producing the best images with the least distortion. The angle at which the magnet is placed also affects visibility of different brain structures.

Conclusion: Proper head positioning, magnet placement at a distance of over 6.5 cm from the external auditory canal, use of spin echo sequences, and fat suppression techniques reduce the size and shape of MRI artifacts.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hainarosie M, Zainea V, Hainarosie R. The evolution of cochlear implant technology and its clinical relevance. J Med Life 2014;7 Spec No. 2(Spec Iss 2):1–4.
    1. Quick Statistics About Hearing. 2021. National Institute of Deafness and Other Communication Disorders, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 25 Mar. 2021. https://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/statistics/quick-statistics-hearing#10 . Accessed January 16, 2023.
    1. Grupe G, Wagner J, Hofmann S, et al. Prevalence and complications of MRI scans of cochlear implant patients. HNO 2017;65(S1):35–40.
    1. Portnoy WM, Mattucci K. Cochlear implants as a contraindication to magnetic resonance imaging. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1991;100:195–7.
    1. Hassepass F, Stabenau V, Arndt S, et al. Magnet dislocation: an increasing and serious complication following MRI in patients with cochlear implants. Rofo 2014;186:680–5.