Divergent effects of switching from cytology to HPV-based screening in the Nordic countries
- PMID: 38261374
- PMCID: PMC10990554
- DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad225
Divergent effects of switching from cytology to HPV-based screening in the Nordic countries
Abstract
Background: Cervical cytology has been the primary method of cervical cancer screening for decades. Tests that detect viral HPV are shown in several randomized trials to provide better protection against cancer compared with cytology. HPV-based screening has been implemented alongside cytology in the Nordic countries for several years. The aim of this study was to compare cytology and HPV-based screening in the colposcopy referrals and detection rates of cervical lesions.
Methods: Individual-level screening data from Finland, Iceland, Norway and Sweden were harmonized and aggregated locally. We utilized data for tests taken during years 2015-17 and biopsies taken during years 2015-19 to allow 24 months of follow-up. Age-standardized estimates and age-adjusted risk ratios for six different outcomes of screening management were calculated.
Results: The age-standardized colposcopy rates were higher in HPV-based testing compared with cytology in Finland (3.5% vs. 0.9%) and Norway (6.0% vs. 4.1%) but lower in Sweden (3.7% vs. 4.9%). The relative detection rate of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 and above in HPV-based testing compared with cytology was highest in Finland (RR 2.37, 95% CI 2.13-2.63) and Norway (RR 1.66, 95% CI 1.57-1.72) while in Sweden the difference was not statistically significant (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95-1.00).
Conclusions: The effects of implementing HPV screening varied by country as different screening algorithms were implemented. HPV-based screening increases colposcopy rates mainly through referrals from increased repeat testing and detection rate is therefore significantly higher compared with cytology. Monitoring of these indicators in subsequent rounds of HPV-based screening remains essential.
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Public Health Association.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Age-specific evaluation of primary human papillomavirus screening vs conventional cytology in a randomized setting.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Dec 2;101(23):1612-23. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp367. Epub 2009 Nov 9. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009. PMID: 19903804 Clinical Trial.
-
Benefits and potential harms of human papillomavirus (HPV)-based cervical cancer screening: A real-world comparison of HPV testing versus cytology.Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021 Mar;100(3):394-402. doi: 10.1111/aogs.14121. Epub 2021 Mar 14. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2021. PMID: 33566361
-
Performance of carcinogenic human papillomavirus (HPV) testing and HPV16 or HPV18 genotyping for cervical cancer screening of women aged 25 years and older: a subanalysis of the ATHENA study.Lancet Oncol. 2011 Sep;12(9):880-90. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70188-7. Epub 2011 Aug 22. Lancet Oncol. 2011. PMID: 21865084 Clinical Trial.
-
Efficacy of HPV DNA testing with cytology triage and/or repeat HPV DNA testing in primary cervical cancer screening.J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Jan 21;101(2):88-99. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn444. Epub 2009 Jan 13. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009. PMID: 19141778
-
Detection rates of precancerous and cancerous cervical lesions within one screening round of primary human papillomavirus DNA testing: prospective randomised trial in Finland.BMJ. 2012 Nov 29;345:e7789. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7789. BMJ. 2012. PMID: 23197596 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
Cited by
-
Impact of HPV Catch-Up Vaccination on High-Grade Cervical Lesions (CIN2+) Among Women Aged 26-30 in Northern Norway.Vaccines (Basel). 2025 Jan 20;13(1):96. doi: 10.3390/vaccines13010096. Vaccines (Basel). 2025. PMID: 39852875 Free PMC article.
-
The incidence of high-risk HPV infections in Slovakia at the start of the national organized screening for cervical cancer.Infect Agent Cancer. 2025 Jun 22;20(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s13027-025-00675-x. Infect Agent Cancer. 2025. PMID: 40545547 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, et al.Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 2021;71:209–49. - PubMed
-
- World Health Organization (WHO). Global Strategy to Accelerate the Elimination of Cervical Cancer as a Public Health Problem. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2020.
-
- Anttila A, Pukkala E, Söderman B, et al.Effect of organised screening on cervical cancer incidence and mortality in Finland, 1963–1995: recent increase in cervical cancer incidence. Int J Cancer 1999;83:59–65. - PubMed
-
- Kyndi M, Frederiksen K, Krüger Kjaer S.. Cervical cancer incidence in Denmark over six decades (1943-2002). Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2006;85:106–11. - PubMed
-
- Lönnberg S, Hansen BT, Haldorsen T, et al.Cervical cancer prevented by screening: long-term incidence trends by morphology in Norway. Int J Cancer 2015;137:1758–64. - PubMed