Exploring key components and factors that influence the use of clinical decision- support tools for prescribing to older patients with kidney disease: the perspective of healthcare providers
- PMID: 38263025
- PMCID: PMC10804714
- DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10568-1
Exploring key components and factors that influence the use of clinical decision- support tools for prescribing to older patients with kidney disease: the perspective of healthcare providers
Abstract
Background: Clinical decision-support (CDS) tools are systems that provide healthcare providers (HCPs) with recommendations based on knowledge and patient-specific factors to facilitate informed decisions.
Objectives: To identify the key components of a CDS tool that are most important to HCPs in caring for older adults with kidney disease, and to understand the facilitators and barriers toward using CDS tools in daily clinical practice.
Methods: Design: A cross-sectional survey of Canadian HCPs was undertaken.
Data collection: Participants affiliated with a provincial college, nephrology organization, or advocacy body were contacted. The survey was conducted between August and October 2021.
Instrument: A 59-item questionnaire was developed and divided into five main domains/themes. Analysis was done descriptively.
Results: Sixty-three participants completed the questionnaire. Physicians (60%) and pharmacists (22%) comprised the majority of the participants. Most of the participants were specialized in nephrology (65%). The most important components in a CDS tool for prescribing to older patients with kidney disease were the safety and efficacy of the medication (89%), the goal of therapy (89%), and patient's quality of life (87%). 90% were willing to use CDS tools and 57% were already using some CDS tools for prescribing. The majority of the participants selected the validation of CDS tools (95%), accompanying the recommendations by the supporting evidence (84%), and the affiliation of the tools with known organizations (84%), as factors that facilitate the use of CDS tools.
Conclusion: CDS tools are being used and are accepted by HCPs and have value in their assistance in engaging patients in making well-informed decisions.
Keywords: Clinical decision-support; Cross-sectional survey; Facilitators and barriers; Older adults; Prescribing.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
Similar articles
-
Enhancing medication management of older adults in Qatar: healthcare professionals' perspectives on challenges, barriers and enabling solutions.Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2024 Oct 7;15:20420986241272846. doi: 10.1177/20420986241272846. eCollection 2024. Ther Adv Drug Saf. 2024. PMID: 39421007 Free PMC article.
-
The implementation, use and sustainability of a clinical decision support system for medication optimisation in primary care: A qualitative evaluation.PLoS One. 2021 May 3;16(5):e0250946. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250946. eCollection 2021. PLoS One. 2021. PMID: 33939750 Free PMC article.
-
General practitioners' attitudes and preparedness towards Clinical Decision Support in e-Prescribing (CDS-eP) adoption in the West of Ireland: a cross sectional study.BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010 Jan 12;10:2. doi: 10.1186/1472-6947-10-2. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010. PMID: 20067624 Free PMC article.
-
Effect of genetics clinical decision support tools on health-care providers' decision making: a mixed-methods systematic review.Genet Med. 2021 Apr;23(4):593-602. doi: 10.1038/s41436-020-01045-1. Epub 2021 Jan 8. Genet Med. 2021. PMID: 33420345
-
Expanding access to veterinary clinical decision support in resource-limited settings: a scoping review of clinical decision support tools in medicine and antimicrobial stewardship.Front Vet Sci. 2024 Jun 4;11:1349188. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2024.1349188. eCollection 2024. Front Vet Sci. 2024. PMID: 38895711 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Clinicians' perspectives on the adoption and implementation of EMR-integrated clinical decision support tools in primary care.Digit Health. 2025 Apr 24;11:20552076251334043. doi: 10.1177/20552076251334043. eCollection 2025 Jan-Dec. Digit Health. 2025. PMID: 40297364 Free PMC article.
-
Development of a Human Factors-Based Guideline to Support the Design, Evaluation, and Continuous Improvement of Clinical Decision Support.Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2024 Nov 27;3(1):100182. doi: 10.1016/j.mcpdig.2024.11.003. eCollection 2025 Mar. Mayo Clin Proc Digit Health. 2024. PMID: 40206997 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bogza L-M, Patry-Lebeau C, Farmanova E, Witteman HO, Elliott J, Stolee P, et al. User-centered design and evaluation of a web-based decision aid for older adults living with mild cognitive impairment and their Health Care providers: mixed methods study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(8):e17406. doi: 10.2196/17406. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Musen MA, Middleton B, Greenes RA. Clinical decision-support systems. Biomedical informatics: Springer; 2021. pp. 795–840.
-
- Muhiyaddin R, Abd-Alrazaq AA, Househ M, Alam T, Shah Z. The impact of clinical decision support systems (CDSS) on physicians: a scoping review. The Importance of Health Informatics in Public Health during a Pandemic. 2020:470–3. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical