Exploring key components and factors that influence the use of clinical decision- support tools for prescribing to older patients with kidney disease: the perspective of healthcare providers
- PMID: 38263025
- PMCID: PMC10804714
- DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10568-1
Exploring key components and factors that influence the use of clinical decision- support tools for prescribing to older patients with kidney disease: the perspective of healthcare providers
Abstract
Background: Clinical decision-support (CDS) tools are systems that provide healthcare providers (HCPs) with recommendations based on knowledge and patient-specific factors to facilitate informed decisions.
Objectives: To identify the key components of a CDS tool that are most important to HCPs in caring for older adults with kidney disease, and to understand the facilitators and barriers toward using CDS tools in daily clinical practice.
Methods: Design: A cross-sectional survey of Canadian HCPs was undertaken.
Data collection: Participants affiliated with a provincial college, nephrology organization, or advocacy body were contacted. The survey was conducted between August and October 2021.
Instrument: A 59-item questionnaire was developed and divided into five main domains/themes. Analysis was done descriptively.
Results: Sixty-three participants completed the questionnaire. Physicians (60%) and pharmacists (22%) comprised the majority of the participants. Most of the participants were specialized in nephrology (65%). The most important components in a CDS tool for prescribing to older patients with kidney disease were the safety and efficacy of the medication (89%), the goal of therapy (89%), and patient's quality of life (87%). 90% were willing to use CDS tools and 57% were already using some CDS tools for prescribing. The majority of the participants selected the validation of CDS tools (95%), accompanying the recommendations by the supporting evidence (84%), and the affiliation of the tools with known organizations (84%), as factors that facilitate the use of CDS tools.
Conclusion: CDS tools are being used and are accepted by HCPs and have value in their assistance in engaging patients in making well-informed decisions.
Keywords: Clinical decision-support; Cross-sectional survey; Facilitators and barriers; Older adults; Prescribing.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no competing interests.
References
-
- Bogza L-M, Patry-Lebeau C, Farmanova E, Witteman HO, Elliott J, Stolee P, et al. User-centered design and evaluation of a web-based decision aid for older adults living with mild cognitive impairment and their Health Care providers: mixed methods study. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22(8):e17406. doi: 10.2196/17406. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Musen MA, Middleton B, Greenes RA. Clinical decision-support systems. Biomedical informatics: Springer; 2021. pp. 795–840.
-
- Muhiyaddin R, Abd-Alrazaq AA, Househ M, Alam T, Shah Z. The impact of clinical decision support systems (CDSS) on physicians: a scoping review. The Importance of Health Informatics in Public Health during a Pandemic. 2020:470–3. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical