Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 23;28(1):34.
doi: 10.1186/s13054-024-04812-7.

Time in ICU and post-intensive care syndrome: how long is long enough?

Affiliations

Time in ICU and post-intensive care syndrome: how long is long enough?

Dylan Flaws et al. Crit Care. .

Abstract

Background: Our understanding of post-ICU recovery is influenced by which patients are selected to study and treat. Many studies currently list an ICU length of stay of at least 24, 48, or 72 h as an inclusion criterion. This may be driven by established evidence that prolonged time in an ICU bed and prolonged ventilation can complicate post-ICU rehabilitation. However, recovery after short ICU stays still needs to be explored.

Methods: This is a secondary analysis from the tracking outcomes post-intensive care (TOPIC) study. One hundred and thirty-two participants were assessed 6-months post-ICU discharge using standardised and validated self-report tools for physical function, cognitive function, anxiety, depression and post-traumatic stress disorder (with clinically significant impairment on any tool being considered a complicated recovery). Routinely collected data relating to the ICU stay were retrospectively accessed, including length of stay and duration of mechanical ventilation. Patients with short ICU stays were intentionally included, with 77 (58%) participants having an ICU length of stay < 72 h.

Results: Of 132 participants, 40 (30%) had at least one identified post-ICU impairment 6 months after leaving ICU, 22 (17%) of whom had an ICU length of stay < 72 h.

Conclusion: Many patients with an ICU length of stay < 72 h are reporting post-ICU impairment 6 months after leaving ICU. This is a population often excluded from studies and interventions. Future research should further explore post-ICU impairment among shorter stays.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Relationship of ICU admission and ventilation durations and post-ICU impairment

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Voiriot G, Oualha M, Pierre A, Salmon-Gandonnière C, Gaudet A, Jouan Y, et al. Chronic critical illness and post-intensive care syndrome: from pathophysiology to clinical challenges. Ann Intensive Care. 2022;12(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13613-022-01038-0. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Inoue S, Hatakeyama J, Kondo Y, Hifumi T, Sakuramoto H, Kawasaki T, et al. Post-intensive care syndrome: its pathophysiology, prevention, and future directions. Acute Med Surg. 2019;6(3):233–246. doi: 10.1002/ams2.415. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee M, Kang J, Jeong YJ. Risk factors for post–intensive care syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Aust Crit Care. 2020;33(3):287–294. doi: 10.1016/j.aucc.2019.10.004. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Flaws D, Patterson S, Fraser J, Tronstad O, Scott JG. Reconceptualizing post-intensive care syndrome: do we need to unpick our PICS? Nurs Crit Care. 2021;26(2):67–69. doi: 10.1111/nicc.12545. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Girard TD, Pandharipande PP. Early mobilisation during critical illness: good for the body and brain. Lancet Respirat Med 2023. - PubMed

Supplementary concepts