Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2024 Jan 23;15(1):7.
doi: 10.1186/s13229-024-00585-6.

Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for irritability in autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis with the GRADE assessment

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for irritability in autism spectrum disorder: a systematic review and meta-analysis with the GRADE assessment

Hangnyoung Choi et al. Mol Autism. .

Abstract

Background: Numerous interventions for irritability in autism spectrum disorder (ASD) have been investigated. We aimed to appraise the magnitude of pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions for irritability in ASD without any restrictions in terms of eligible interventions.

Methods: We systematically searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, and Web of Science until April 15, 2023. We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with a parallel design that examined the efficacy of interventions for the treatment of irritability in patients of any age with ASD without any restrictions in terms of eligible interventions. We performed a random-effects meta-analysis by pooling effect sizes as Hedges' g. We classified assessed interventions as follows: pharmacological monotherapy, risperidone plus adjuvant therapy versus risperidone monotherapy, non-pharmacological intervention, and dietary intervention. We utilized the Cochrane tool to evaluate the risk of bias in each study and the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of evidence for each meta-analyzed intervention.

Results: Out of 5640 references, we identified 60 eligible articles with 45 different kinds of interventions, including 3531 participants, of which 80.9% were males (mean age [SD] = 8.79 [3.85]). For pharmacological monotherapy, risperidone (Hedges' g - 0.857, 95% CI - 1.263 to - 0.451, certainty of evidence: high) and aripiprazole (Hedges' g - 0.559, 95% CI - 0.767 to - 0.351, certainty of evidence: high) outperformed placebo. Among the non-pharmacological interventions, parent training (Hedges' g - 0.893, 95% CI - 1.184 to - 0.602, certainty of evidence: moderate) showed a significant result. None of the meta-analyzed interventions yielded significant effects among risperidone + adjuvant therapy and dietary supplementation. However, several novel molecules in augmentation to risperidone outperformed risperidone monotherapy, yet from one RCT each.

Limitations: First, various tools have been utilized to measure the irritability in ASD, which may contribute to the heterogeneity of the outcomes. Second, meta-analyses for each intervention included only a small number of studies and participants.

Conclusions: Only risperidone, aripiprazole among pharmacological interventions, and parent training among non-pharmacological interventions can be recommended for irritability in ASD. As an augmentation to risperidone, several novel treatments show promising effects, but further RCTs are needed to replicate findings. Trial registration PROSPERO, CRD42021243965.

Keywords: Autism spectrum disorder; Irritability; Meta-analysis; Randomized controlled trial; Systematic review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

SC received payment or honoraria from ACAMH and BAP for educational talks on ADHD. PFP received honoraria/has been a consultant for Angelini, Menarini, Lundbeck, and Sunovion. MS received honoraria/has been a consultant for ABBVie, Angelini, Lundbeck, and Otsuka.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study selection flow
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Summary of pooled estimates of meta-analyzed interventions for irritability in autism spectrum disorder. CI confidence interval, N.estimate number of estimates, N.participants number of participants. Black rhombus indicated statistical significance and white circles indicated nonsignificance
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Summary plot of quality assessment (RoB2)
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Quality assessment results for each domain of RoB2. Green plus = Low risk of bias, Yellow minus = Some concerns in risk of bias, Red cross = High risk of bias. D1 = Bias arising from the randomization process, D2 = bias due to deviations from intended interventions, D3 = bias due to missing outcome data, D4 = bias in the measurement of the outcome, D5 = bias in the selection of the reported result

References

    1. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
    1. Maenner MJ, Warren Z, Williams AR, Amoakohene E, Bakian AV, Bilder DA, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of autism spectrum disorder among children aged 8 years—autism and developmental disabilities monitoring network, 11 sites, United States, 2020. MMWR Surveill Summ. 2023;72(2):1–14. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.ss7202a1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Collishaw S, Maughan B, Natarajan L, Pickles A. Trends in adolescent emotional problems in England: a comparison of two national cohorts twenty years apart. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2010;51(8):885–894. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.2010.02252.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brotman MA, Kircanski K, Stringaris A, Pine DS, Leibenluft E. Irritability in youths: a translational model. Am J Psychiatry. 2017;174(6):520–532. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16070839. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leibenluft E. Pediatric irritability: a systems neuroscience approach. Trends Cogn Sci. 2017;21(4):277–289. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.02.002. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types