Pre-TAVI imaging: an Italian survey by the CT PRotocol optimization (CT-PRO) group
- PMID: 38263535
- PMCID: PMC11052815
- DOI: 10.1007/s10554-024-03052-8
Pre-TAVI imaging: an Italian survey by the CT PRotocol optimization (CT-PRO) group
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this survey was to evaluate the current state-of-art of pre-TAVI imaging in a large radiological professional community.
Methods: Between December 2022 and January 2023 all members of the Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM) were invited by the CT PRotocol Optimization group (CT-PRO group) to complete an online 24-item questionnaire about pre-TAVI imaging.
Results: 557 SIRM members participated in the survey. The greatest part of respondents were consultant radiologists employed in public hospitals and 84% claimed to routinely perform pre-TAVI imaging at their institutions. The most widespread acquisition protocol consisted of an ECG-gated CT angiography (CTA) scan of the aortic root and heart followed by a non-ECG-synchronized CTA of the thorax, abdomen, and pelvis. Contrast agent administration was generally tailored on the patient's body weight with a preference for using high concentration contrast media. The reports were commonly written by radiologists with expertise in cardiovascular imaging, and included all the measurements suggested by current guidelines for adequate pre-procedural planning. About 60% of the subjects affirmed that the Heart Team is present at their institutions, however only 7% of the respondents regularly attended the multidisciplinary meetings.
Conclusions: This survey defines the current pre-TAVI imaging practice in a large radiological professional community. Interestingly, despite the majority of radiologists follow the current guidelines regarding acquisition and reporting of pre-TAVI imaging studies, there is still a noteworthy absence from multidisciplinary meetings and from the Heart Team.
Keywords: Aortic valve stenosis; Cardiac imaging techniques; Computed tomography angiography; Surveys and questionnaires.
© 2024. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
T.D. received speaking fees from Bracco and Philips. M.F. and R.I. received speaking fees from Bracco. All other authors have nothing to disclose.
Figures



Similar articles
-
Leaflet thrombosis following transcatheter aortic valve implantation.J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2018 Jan-Feb;12(1):8-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2017.11.002. Epub 2017 Nov 9. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2018. PMID: 29195844
-
Recommendations in pre-procedural imaging assessment for transcatheter aortic valve implantation intervention: Italian Society of Cardiology (SIC)-Italian Society of Medical and Interventional Radiology (SIRM) position paper part 1 (Clinical Indication and Basic Technical Aspects, Heart Team, Role of Echocardiography).J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2022 Apr 1;23(4):216-227. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000001293. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2022. PMID: 35287156
-
Contrast volume reduction using third generation dual source computed tomography for the evaluation of patients prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation.Eur Radiol. 2016 Dec;26(12):4497-4504. doi: 10.1007/s00330-016-4320-8. Epub 2016 Mar 19. Eur Radiol. 2016. PMID: 26995206
-
Role of computed tomography in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and valve-in-valve implantation: complete review of preprocedural and postprocedural imaging.J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2020 Mar;21(3):182-191. doi: 10.2459/JCM.0000000000000899. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown). 2020. PMID: 32012138 Review.
-
Practical considerations for optimizing cardiac computed tomography protocols for comprehensive acquisition prior to transcatheter aortic valve replacement.J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016 Sep-Oct;10(5):364-74. doi: 10.1016/j.jcct.2016.07.007. Epub 2016 Jul 5. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016. PMID: 27475972 Review.
References
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources