Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 9:13:1291980.
doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1291980. eCollection 2023.

Etiology of lower respiratory tract in pneumonia based on metagenomic next-generation sequencing: a retrospective study

Affiliations

Etiology of lower respiratory tract in pneumonia based on metagenomic next-generation sequencing: a retrospective study

Jin-Zhu Wang et al. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. .

Abstract

Introduction: Pneumonia are the leading cause of death worldwide, and antibiotic treatment remains fundamental. However, conventional sputum smears or cultures are still inefficient for obtaining pathogenic microorganisms.Metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) has shown great value in nucleic acid detection, however, the NGS results for lower respiratory tract microorganisms are still poorly studied.

Methods: This study dealt with investigating the efficacy of mNGS in detecting pathogens in the lower respiratory tract of patients with pulmonary infections. A total of 112 patients admitted at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between April 30, 2018, and June 30, 2020, were enrolled in this retrospective study. The bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) was obtained from lower respiratory tract from each patient. Routine methods (bacterial smear and culture) and mNGS were employed for the identification of pathogenic microorganisms in BALF.

Results: The average patient age was 53.0 years, with 94.6% (106/112) obtaining pathogenic microorganism results. The total mNGS detection rate of pathogenic microorganisms significantly surpassed conventional methods (93.7% vs. 32.1%, P < 0.05). Notably, 75% of patients (84/112) were found to have bacteria by mNGS, but only 28.6% (32/112) were found to have bacteria by conventional approaches. The most commonly detected bacteria included Acinetobacter baumannii (19.6%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (17.9%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (14.3%), Staphylococcus faecium (12.5%), Enterococcus faecium (12.5%), and Haemophilus parainfluenzae (11.6%). In 29.5% (33/112) of patients, fungi were identified using mNGS, including 23 cases of Candida albicans (20.5%), 18 of Pneumocystis carinii (16.1%), and 10 of Aspergillus (8.9%). However, only 7.1 % (8/112) of individuals were found to have fungi when conventional procedures were used. The mNGS detection rate of viruses was significantly higher than the conventional method rate (43.8% vs. 0.9%, P < 0.05). The most commonly detected viruses included Epstein-Barr virus (15.2%), cytomegalovirus (13.4%), circovirus (8.9%), human coronavirus (4.5%), and rhinovirus (4.5%). Only 29.4% (33/112) of patients were positive, whereas 5.4% (6/112) of patients were negative for both detection methods as shown by Kappa analysis, indicating poor consistency between the two methods (P = 0.340; Kappa analysis).

Conclusion: Significant benefits of mNGS have been shown in the detection of pathogenic microorganisms in patients with pulmonary infection. For those with suboptimal therapeutic responses, mNGS can provide an etiological basis, aiding in precise anti-infective treatment.

Keywords: antibiotics; etiology; lower respiratory tract; metagenomic next-generation sequencing; pulmonary infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow diagram.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Comparing mNGS-based pathogen detection with conventional detection techniques. (* P<0.05).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Identification of pathogens by use of mNGS as compared to conventional approaches.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Pathogen identification consistency between mNGS and conventional methods.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Afshinnekoo E., Chou C., Alexander N., Ahsanuddin S., Schuetz A. N., Mason C. E. (2017). Precision metagenomics: rapid metagenomic analyses for infectious disease diagnostics and public health surveillance. J. Biomol Tech. 28 (1), 40–45. doi: 10.7171/jbt.17-2801-007 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ai J. W., Zhang Y., Zhang H. C., Xu T., Zhang W. H. (2020). Era of molecular diagnosis for pathogen identification of unexplained pneumonia, lessons to be learned. Emerg. Microbes Infect. 9 (1), 597–600. doi: 10.1080/22221751.2020.1738905 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Biswas C., Chen S. C., Halliday C., Martinez E., Rockett R. J., Wang Q., et al. . (2017). Whole genome sequencing of candida glabrata for detection of markers of antifungal drug resistance. J. Vis. Exp. 28(130), 56714. doi: 10.3791/56714 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Boldrin E., Mazza M., Piano M. A., Alfieri R., Montagner I. M., Magni G., et al. . (2022). Putative Clinical Potential of ERBB2 Amplification Assessment by ddPCR in FFPE-DNA and cfDNA of Gastroesophageal Adenocarcinoma Patients. Cancers (Basel). 14 (9), 2180. doi: 10.3390/cancers14092180 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cainap C., Balacescu O., Cainap S. S., Pop L. A. (2021). Next generation sequencing technology in lung cancer diagnosis. Biol. (Basel). 10 (9), 864. doi: 10.3390/biology10090864 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types