Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2024 Jan;14(1):e1544.
doi: 10.1002/ctm2.1544.

Seize the engine: Emerging cell cycle targets in breast cancer

Affiliations
Review

Seize the engine: Emerging cell cycle targets in breast cancer

Jesús Fuentes-Antrás et al. Clin Transl Med. 2024 Jan.

Abstract

Breast cancer arises from a series of molecular alterations that disrupt cell cycle checkpoints, leading to aberrant cell proliferation and genomic instability. Targeted pharmacological inhibition of cell cycle regulators has long been considered a promising anti-cancer strategy. Initial attempts to drug critical cell cycle drivers were hampered by poor selectivity, modest efficacy and haematological toxicity. Advances in our understanding of the molecular basis of cell cycle disruption and the mechanisms of resistance to CDK4/6 inhibitors have reignited interest in blocking specific components of the cell cycle machinery, such as CDK2, CDK4, CDK7, PLK4, WEE1, PKMYT1, AURKA and TTK. These targets play critical roles in regulating quiescence, DNA replication and chromosome segregation. Extensive preclinical data support their potential to overcome CDK4/6 inhibitor resistance, induce synthetic lethality or sensitise tumours to immune checkpoint inhibitors. This review provides a biological and drug development perspective on emerging cell cycle targets and novel inhibitors, many of which exhibit favourable safety profiles and promising activity in clinical trials.

Keywords: breast cancer; cell cycle checkpoints; clinical trials; cyclin-dependent kinases; drug development; mitotic kinases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

D. W. C.: Consulting or Advisory Role—AstraZeneca; Daiichi Sankyo; Eisai; Gilead Sciences; GlaxoSmithKline; Inflex; Inivata/NeoGenomics; Lilly; Merck; Novartis; Pfizer; Roche/Genentech and Saga. Research Funding—AstraZeneca (Inst); GlaxoSmithKline (Inst); Guardant Health (Inst); Inivata/NeoGenomics (Inst); Knight Therapeutics (Inst); Merck (Inst); Pfizer (Inst); ProteinQure (Inst); and Roche/Genentech (Inst). Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property—Patent (US62/675,228) for methods of treating cancers characterized by a high expression level of spindle and kinetochore associated complex subunit 3 (ska3) gene. P. L. B.: Consulting or Advisory Role—Seattle Genetics; Lilly; Amgen; Merck; Gilead Sciences; Zymeworks; Repare Therapeutics; BMS; Pfizer. Research Funding—Bristol‐Myers‐Squibb (Inst); Sanofi (Inst); AstraZeneca (Inst); Genentech/Roche (Inst); GlaxoSmithKline (Inst); Novartis (Inst); Merck (Inst); Seattle Genetics (Inst); Amgen (Inst); Bicara (Inst); Zymeworks (Int); Medicenna (Inst); Bayer (Inst); Takeda (Inst). J. F. A. declares no competing interests. CFI‐402257 and CFI‐400945 were developed at the University Health Network (the authors' institution).

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Graphical simplification of cell cycle phases, checkpoints and regulatory mechanisms in breast cancer.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Temporal overview of drug development targeting the cell cycle. The year of the last report of clinical data since 2010, either journal article or conference abstract, is shown. Further detail is provided in Tables 1 and 2, including drugs with no available clinical data at present.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Rationale and challenges for the potential development of cell cycle inhibitors in combination with other therapies in breast cancer. ADC, antibody–drug conjugate; HRD, homologous recombination deficiency; ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitor; ILD, interstitial lung disease; LFT, liver function tests; TME, tumour microenvironment.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kastan MB, Bartek J. Cell‐cycle checkpoints and cancer. Nature. 2004;432(7015):316‐323. doi:10.1038/nature03097 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Platet N, Cathiard AM, Gleizes M, Garcia M. Estrogens and their receptors in breast cancer progression: a dual role in cancer proliferation and invasion. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2004;51(1):55‐67. doi:10.1016/j.critrevonc.2004.02.001 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rinaldi J, Sokol ES, Hartmaier RJ, et al. The genomic landscape of metastatic breast cancer: insights from 11,000 tumors. PLoS One. 2020;15(5):e0231999. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0231999 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Razavi P, Chang MT, Xu G, et al. The genomic landscape of endocrine‐resistant advanced breast cancers. Cancer Cell. 2018;34(3):427‐438.e6. doi:10.1016/j.ccell.2018.08.008 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shi Y, Jin J, Ji W, Guan X. Therapeutic landscape in mutational triple negative breast cancer. Mol Cancer. 2018;17(1):99. doi:10.1186/s12943-018-0850-9 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances