The value of additional electrodes when stereo-electroencephalography is inconclusive
- PMID: 38265418
- DOI: 10.1111/epi.17885
The value of additional electrodes when stereo-electroencephalography is inconclusive
Abstract
Objective: Stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) is the preferred method for intracranial localization of the seizure-onset zone (SOZ) in drug-resistant focal epilepsy. Occasionally SEEG evaluation fails to confirm the pre-implantation hypothesis. This leads to a decision tree regarding whether the addition of SEEG electrodes (two-step SEEG - 2sSEEG) or placement of subdural electrodes (SDEs) after SEEG (SEEG2SDE) would help. There is a dearth of literature encompassing this scenario, and here we aimed to characterize outcomes following unplanned two-step intracranial EEG (iEEG).
Methods: All 225 adult SEEG cases over 8 years at our institution were reviewed to extract patient data and outcomes following a two-step evaluation. Three raters independently quantified benefits of additional intracranial electrodes. The relationship between two-step iEEG benefit and clinical outcome was then analyzed.
Results: Fourteen patients underwent 2sSEEG and nine underwent SEEG2SDE. In the former cohort, the second SEEG procedure was performed for these reasons-precise localization of the SOZ (36%); defining margins of eloquent cortex (21%); and broadening coverage in the setting of non-localizable seizure onsets (43% of cases). Sixty-four percent of 2sSEEG cases were consistently deemed beneficial (Light's κ = 0.80). 2sSEEG performed for the first two indications was much more beneficial than when onsets were not localizable (100% vs 17%, p = .02). In the SEEG2SDE cohort, SDEs identified the SOZ and enabled delineation of margins relative to eloquent cortex in all cases.
Significance: The two-step iEEG is useful if the initial evaluation is broadly concordant with the original electroclinical hypothesis, where it can clarify onset zones or delineate safe surgical margins; however, it provides minimal benefit when the implantation hypothesis is erroneous, and we recommend that 2sSEEG not be generally utilized in such cases. SDE implantation after SEEG minimizes the need for SDEs and is helpful in delineating surgical boundaries relative to ictal-onset zones and eloquent cortex.
Keywords: drug-resistant epilepsy; epilepsy surgery; medically intractable epilepsy; robotic surgery.
© 2024 International League Against Epilepsy.
Similar articles
-
Comparative effectiveness of stereotactic, subdural, or hybrid intracranial EEG monitoring in epilepsy surgery.J Neurosurg. 2024 Mar 8;141(2):372-380. doi: 10.3171/2024.1.JNS232560. Print 2024 Aug 1. J Neurosurg. 2024. PMID: 38457804
-
Analysis of Morbidity and Outcomes Associated With Use of Subdural Grids vs Stereoelectroencephalography in Patients With Intractable Epilepsy.JAMA Neurol. 2019 Jun 1;76(6):672-681. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.0098. JAMA Neurol. 2019. PMID: 30830149 Free PMC article.
-
Safety and efficacy of stereoelectroencephalography in pediatric focal epilepsy: a single-center experience.J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018 Oct;22(4):444-452. doi: 10.3171/2018.5.PEDS1856. Epub 2018 Jul 20. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2018. PMID: 30028270
-
Presurgical intracranial investigations in epilepsy surgery.Handb Clin Neurol. 2019;161:45-71. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-64142-7.00040-0. Handb Clin Neurol. 2019. PMID: 31307620 Review.
-
Depth versus surface: A critical review of subdural and depth electrodes in intracranial electroencephalographic studies.Epilepsia. 2024 Jul;65(7):1868-1878. doi: 10.1111/epi.18002. Epub 2024 May 9. Epilepsia. 2024. PMID: 38722693 Review.
Cited by
-
SEEG in 2025: progress and pending challenges in stereotaxy methods, biomarkers and radiofrequency thermocoagulation.Curr Opin Neurol. 2025 Apr 1;38(2):111-120. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000001351. Epub 2025 Feb 10. Curr Opin Neurol. 2025. PMID: 39927419 Free PMC article. Review.
-
When Considering Supplemental SEEG, Remember the Die is Cast Before the First Implantation.Epilepsy Curr. 2024 Oct 16;24(6):406-408. doi: 10.1177/15357597241280483. eCollection 2024 Nov-Dec. Epilepsy Curr. 2024. PMID: 39540132 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Advancements in Surgical Therapies for Drug-Resistant Epilepsy: A Paradigm Shift towards Precision Care.Neurol Ther. 2025 Apr;14(2):467-490. doi: 10.1007/s40120-025-00710-4. Epub 2025 Feb 10. Neurol Ther. 2025. PMID: 39928287 Free PMC article. Review.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Jobst BC, Bartolomei F, Diehl B, Frauscher B, Kahane P, Minotti L, et al. Intracranial EEG in the 21st century. Epilepsy Curr. 2020;20(4):180-188.
-
- Rosenow F, Lüders H. Presurgical evaluation of epilepsy. Brain. 2001;124(Pt 9):1683-1700.
-
- Jayakar P, Gotman J, Harvey AS, Palmini A, Tassi L, Schomer D, et al. Diagnostic utility of invasive EEG for epilepsy surgery: indications, modalities, and techniques. Epilepsia. 2016;57(11):1735-1747.
-
- Tandon N, Tong BA, Friedman ER, Johnson JA, Von Allmen G, Thomas MS, et al. Analysis of morbidity and outcomes associated with use of subdural grids vs Stereoelectroencephalography in patients with intractable epilepsy. JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(6):672-681.
-
- Cardinale F, Casaceli G, Raneri F, Miller J, Lo Russo G. Implantation of Stereoelectroencephalography electrodes. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2016;33(6):490-502.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources