Effects of robotic therapy associated with noninvasive brain stimulation on motor function in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
- PMID: 38265422
- PMCID: PMC11749291
- DOI: 10.1080/10790268.2024.2304921
Effects of robotic therapy associated with noninvasive brain stimulation on motor function in individuals with incomplete spinal cord injury: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials
Abstract
Context: Motor deficits are among the most common consequences of incomplete spinal cord injury (SCI). These impairments can affect patients' levels of functioning and quality of life. Combined robotic therapy and non-invasive brain stimulation (NIBS) have been used to improve motor impairments in patients with corticospinal tract lesions.
Objectives: To examine the effects of combined robotic therapy and NIBS on motor function post incomplete SCI.
Methods: PubMed, SCOPUS, MEDLINE, PEDro, Web of Science, REHABDATA, CINAHL, and EMBASE were searched from inception until July 2023. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale was employed to evaluate the selected studies quality.
Results: Of 557 studies, five randomized trials (n = 122), with 25% of participants being females, were included in this review. The PEDro scores ranged from eight to nine, with a median score of nine. There were variations in treatment protocols and outcome measures, resulting in heterogeneous findings. The findings showed revealed evidence for the impacts of combined robotic therapy and NIBS on motor function in individuals with incomplete SCI.
Conclusions: Combined robotic training and NIBS may be safe for individuals with incomplete SCI. The existing evidence concerning its effects on motor outcomes in individuals with SCI is limited. Further experimental studies are needed to understand the effects of combined robotic training and NIBS on motor impairments in SCI populations.
Keywords: Motor; Non-invasive brain stimulation; Rehabilitation; Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation; Robotics; Spinal cord injury; Transcranial direct current stimulation.
Conflict of interest statement
No potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).
Similar articles
-
Effects of non-invasive brain stimulation on motor function after spinal cord injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023 Jan 12;20(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01129-4. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023. PMID: 36635693 Free PMC article.
-
Examining the effectiveness of motor imagery combined with non-invasive brain stimulation for upper limb recovery in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024 Nov 30;21(1):209. doi: 10.1186/s12984-024-01491-x. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2024. PMID: 39616389 Free PMC article.
-
Efficacy of arm crank ergometry on individuals with spinal cord injury: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.PM R. 2024 Sep;16(9):1001-1011. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.13143. Epub 2024 Apr 6. PM R. 2024. PMID: 38581364
-
Robot-assisted gait training in individuals with spinal cord injury: A systematic review for the clinical effectiveness of Lokomat.J Clin Neurosci. 2021 Sep;91:260-269. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.07.019. Epub 2021 Jul 26. J Clin Neurosci. 2021. PMID: 34373038
-
Effects of locomotor training after incomplete spinal cord injury: a systematic review.Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Nov;94(11):2297-308. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.06.023. Epub 2013 Jul 9. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013. PMID: 23850614
References
-
- Kang YN, Ding H, Zhou H, Wei Z, Liu L, Pan D, Feng S.. Epidemiology of worldwide spinal cord injury: a literature review. J Neurorestoratol [Internet] 2017;6:1–9. doi:10.2147/jn.s143236. - DOI
-
- World Health Organization: WHO . Spinal cord injury [Internet]. 2013. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/spinal-cord-injury.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical