Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Mar;29(3):318-324.
doi: 10.1007/s10147-023-02457-0. Epub 2024 Jan 24.

The prognostic impact of treatment centralization in patients with testicular germ cell tumors: analysis of hospital-based cancer registry data in Japan

Affiliations

The prognostic impact of treatment centralization in patients with testicular germ cell tumors: analysis of hospital-based cancer registry data in Japan

Shuhei Suzuki et al. Int J Clin Oncol. 2024 Mar.

Abstract

Background: To identify the prognostic impact of treatment centralization in patients with testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT).

Methods: We used a hospital-based cancer registry data in Japan to extract seminoma and non-seminoma cases that were diagnosed in 2013, histologically confirmed, and received the first course of treatment. To compare the 5-years overall survival (OS) rates of patients stratified by institutional care volume, we performed a Cox proportional hazards regression analysis using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method to adjust patient backgrounds.

Results: A total of 1767 TGCT patients were identified. The 5-years OS rates for stage II and III TGCT patients treated at low-volume institutions (< 7 cases) were significantly worse than high-volume institutions (≥ 7 cases) (91.2% vs. 83.4%, p = 0.012). Histological stratification revealed that 5-year OS rates for stage II and III seminoma patients in the low-volume group were significantly worse than the high-volume group (93.5% vs. 84.5%, p = 0.041). Multivariate OS analysis using an IPTW-matched cohort showed that institutional care volume was an independent prognostic factor (hazard ratio 2.13 [95% confidence interval: 1.23-3.71], p = 0.0072).

Conclusion: Our results indicate that stage II and III TGCT patients experience lower survival rates at low-volume institutions and would benefit from treatment centralization.

Keywords: Hospital-based cancer registry; Overall survival; Testicular germ cell tumor; Treatment centralization.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Purdue MP, Devesa SS, Sigurdson AJ et al (2005) International patterns and trends in testis cancer incidence. Int J Cancer 115(5):822–827. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.20931 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Trabert B, Chen J, Devesa SS et al (2015) International patterns and trends in testicular cancer incidence, overall and by histologic subtype. 1973–2007. Andrology 3(1):4–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/andr.293 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abern MR, Dude AM, Coogan CL et al (2012) Marital status independently predicts testis cancer survival—an analysis of the SEER database. Urol Oncol 30(4):487–493. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2010.03.005 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Williams SB, Ray-Zack MD, Hudgins HK et al (2019) Impact of centralizing care for genitourinary malignancies to high-volume providers: a systematic review. Eur Urol Oncol 2(3):265–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2018.10.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Collette L, Sylvester RJ, Stenning SP et al (1999) Impact of the treating institution on survival of patients with “poor-prognosis” metastatic nonseminoma. J Natl Cancer Inst 91(10):839–846. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/91.10.839 - DOI - PubMed

Supplementary concepts

LinkOut - more resources