Agriculture land use transformation: A threat to sustainable food production systems, rural food security, and farmer well-being?
- PMID: 38265990
- PMCID: PMC10807767
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296332
Agriculture land use transformation: A threat to sustainable food production systems, rural food security, and farmer well-being?
Abstract
The acquisition of agricultural land is a crucial aspect of survival for numerous rural communities, serving as a fundamental tool for combating poverty and food insecurity and promoting equitable sustainable economic progress. The expropriation of land offers a promising prospect for remedying past inequities and promoting both economic progress and food sufficiency. Limited research has examined the association between land expropriation and food security, livelihood shocks, and the well-being of rural households worldwide. Therefore, this research explores the implications of land expropriation on food security, livelihood shocks, and well-being of land lost rural communities. The data were collected from 384 farmers selected through stratified sampling techniques using face-to-face surveys in rural China. The data were analyzed using descriptive and logit regression models. The descriptive findings showed that land expropriation has detrimental effects on the livelihood, food security, and well-being of the farmers. Furthermore, these impacts are more harmful among land-expropriated households with a lower educational level, a large family size, and women farmers in less developed rural communities. The econometric results evinced that gender, age, education level, marital status, family size, and negative changes in income all significantly affect the impact of land expropriation on the food security of farmers. Similarly, the findings revealed that farmers with lower education levels were more likely to be affected by land loss as compared to farmers with medium and high education levels. Farmers with complete land loss were 1.70 times more likely to suffer livelihood shocks than those with partial land loss. The results also evinced that the well-being of all farmers was not affected equally, and some farmers' well-being was affected more than others due to various socioeconomic backgrounds. Therefore, this study suggests the implementation of public policies that provide support to farmers who have been marginalized due to land acquisition.
Copyright: © 2024 Li et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
References
-
- Ghatak M., Mookherjee D., 2014. Land acquisition for industrialization and compensation of displaced farmers. J. Dev. Econ. 110, 303–312.
-
- Deng X., Huang J., Rozelle S., Zhang J., & Li Z. (2015). Impact of urbanization on cultivated land changes in China. Land use policy, 45, 1–7.
-
- Liu S., Zhang P., & Lo K. (2014). Urbanization in remote areas: A case study of the Heilongjiang Reclamation Area, Northeast China. Habitat International, 42, 103–110.
-
- Qian Z. (2017). Resettlement and adaptation in China’s small town urbanization: Evidence from the villagers’ perspective. Habitat International, 67, 33–43.
-
- Lo K., & Wang M. (2018). How voluntary is poverty alleviation resettlement in China?. Habitat International, 73, 34–42.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous