Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 24;25(1):31.
doi: 10.1186/s12882-023-03375-z.

Psychosocial characteristics of potential and actual living kidney donors

Liza K Cholin  1 , Everly F Ramos  2 , Jordana Yahr  2 , Jesse D Schold  3 , Emilio D Poggio  4   5 , Christina L Delvalle  5 , Anne M Huml  4   5
Affiliations

Psychosocial characteristics of potential and actual living kidney donors

Liza K Cholin et al. BMC Nephrol. .

Abstract

The psychosocial assessment is an essential component of the living kidney donor (LKD) evaluation. However, it remains uncertain how specific psychosocial factors impact LKD eligibility. We performed a retrospective chart review of LKD candidates who initiated the evaluation process and who had completed a required, in-person licensed social work (LSW) visit. LSW notes were reviewed for frequency of psychosocial factors that may impact the success of LKD candidate approval by the selection committee. 325 LKD candidates were included in the study: 104 not-approved and 221 approved. Not-approved LKD candidates were more likely to receive a negative family reaction to wanting to donate than approved LKD candidates (8.7% vs 1.4%, p < 0.01). On multivariate analysis, Black race, history of psychiatric illness, highest level of education being high school, and high psychosocial risk score assignment were all associated with a lower odds ratio of being approved. The majority of not-approved LKD candidates were disqualified for medical reasons (N = 76, 73.1%). In conclusion, psychosocial factors impact donation even after LKD candidates make it to an in-person evaluation.

Keywords: Kidney donor evaluation; Living donor; Psychoscocial risk.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests. The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Psychosocial Risk Factor Count
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Dew MA, Jacobs CL, Jowsey SG, et al. Guidelines for the psychosocial evaluation of living unrelated kidney donors in the United States. Am J Transplant. 2007;7(5):1047–1054. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01751.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Abecassis M, Adams M, Adams P, et al. Consensus statement on the live organ donor. JAMA. 2000;284(22):2919–2926. doi: 10.1001/jama.284.22.2919. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rodrigue JR, Pavlakis M, Danovitch GM, et al. Evaluating living kidney donors: relationship types, psychosocial criteria, and consent processes at US transplant programs. Am J Transplant. 2007;7(10):2326–2332. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2007.01921.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Duerinckx N, Timmerman L, Van Gogh J, et al. Predonation psychosocial evaluation of living kidney and liver donor candidates: a systematic literature review. Transpl Int. 2014;27(1):2–18. doi: 10.1111/tri.12154. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Conrad R, Kleiman A, Rambau S, et al. Psychosocial assessment of living kidney donors: What implications have temperament and character for decision-making? Compr Psychiatry. 2016;67:1–8. doi: 10.1016/j.comppsych.2016.02.007. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types