Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan;34(1):e14545.
doi: 10.1111/sms.14545.

Physiological and molecular predictors of cycling sprint performance

Affiliations

Physiological and molecular predictors of cycling sprint performance

Victor Galvan-Alvarez et al. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2024 Jan.

Abstract

The study aimed to identify novel muscle phenotypic factors that could determine sprint performance using linear regression models including the lean mass of the lower extremities (LLM), myosin heavy chain composition (MHC), and proteins and enzymes implicated in glycolytic and aerobic energy generation (citrate synthase, OXPHOS proteins), oxygen transport and diffusion (myoglobin), ROS sensing (Nrf2/Keap1), antioxidant enzymes, and proteins implicated in calcium handling. For this purpose, body composition (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry) and sprint performance (isokinetic 30-s Wingate test: peak and mean power output, Wpeak and Wmean ) were measured in young physically active adults (51 males and 10 females), from which a resting muscle biopsy was obtained from the musculus vastus lateralis. Although females had a higher percentage of MHC I, SERCA2, pSer16 /Thr17 -phospholamban, and Calsequestrin 2 protein expressions (all p < 0.05), and 18.4% lower phosphofructokinase 1 protein expression than males (p < 0.05), both sexes had similar sprint performance when it was normalized to body weight or LLM. Multiple regression analysis showed that Wpeak could be predicted from LLM, SDHB, Keap1, and MHC II % (R 2 = 0.62, p < 0.001), each variable contributing to explain 46.4%, 6.3%, 4.4%, and 4.3% of the variance in Wpeak , respectively. LLM and MHC II % explained 67.5% and 2.1% of the variance in Wmean , respectively (R 2 = 0.70, p < 0.001). The present investigation shows that SDHB and Keap1, in addition to MHC II %, are relevant determinants of peak power output during sprinting.

Keywords: Keap1; ROS; SERCA; Wingate test; fatigue; muscle mass; muscle phenotype; myoglobin.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

REFERENCES

    1. van der Zwaard S , van der Laarse WJ , Weide G , et al. Critical determinants of combined sprint and endurance performance: an integrative analysis from muscle fiber to the human body. FASEB J. 2018;32(4):2110-2123.
    1. Kordi M , Folland J , Goodall S , et al. Mechanical and morphological determinants of peak power output in elite cyclists. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2020;30(2):227-237.
    1. Weber CL , Chia M , Inbar O . Gender differences in anaerobic power of the arms and legs-a scaling issue. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(1):129-137.
    1. Perez-Gomez J , Rodriguez GV , Ara I , et al. Role of muscle mass on sprint performance: gender differences? Eur J Appl Physiol. 2008;102(6):685-694.
    1. Pearson SJ , Cobbold M , Orrell RW , Harridge SD . Power output and muscle myosin heavy chain composition in young and elderly men. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38(9):1601-1607.

Substances

LinkOut - more resources