Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan;11(1):e2089.
doi: 10.1002/nop2.2089.

Research delivery secondments: A scoping review

Naomi Hare  1 , Sharon Grieve  2   3 , Janine Valentine  4   5 , Julie Menzies  6
Affiliations

Research delivery secondments: A scoping review

Naomi Hare et al. Nurs Open. 2024 Jan.

Abstract

Aim: To explore and summarise published literature with regards to secondments to clinical research and to identify the gaps in research to inform further work.

Design: Systematic scoping review.

Method: A scoping review was undertaken in accordance with the Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence and Research framework. Databases searched included CINAHL, PubMed, Medline and Embase. Inclusion/exclusion criteria were applied by two independent reviewers. Two reviewers independently retrieved full-text studies for inclusion and applied the framework as a tool for synthesising Patterns, Advances, Gaps, Evidence and Research recommendations.

Results: Six papers and one abstract published between 2003 and 2018 were included. All secondees (n = 34) were released from NHS posts, with secondments (where specified) ranging in duration from 0.25 to 2 years and for 40%-100% of their working hours. All seven papers reported benefits for personal and professional development, predominantly in the form of personal reflections. Few described involvement with research delivery teams.

Conclusion: Published initiatives vary in nature and lack standardised reporting and measurement of impact. Further research is required to identify benefits at a departmental or organisational level, the facilitators for setting up secondments and the application of knowledge gained from secondment opportunities.

Implications for the profession: Undertaking a research secondment is reported to offer professional and personal benefit for clinical staff. Research secondments are one way in which a research culture can practically be embedded within clinical settings.

Impact: This scoping review identified a lack of published empirical research seeking to understand research secondments as a tool to enhance research and evidence engagement. Although there is a suggestion that secondments could positively impact staff retention, there is limited evidence about the benefit for the organisation or for patient care. These findings have implications for staff, managers and their organisations.

Reporting method: The PRISMA-ScR guidelines were used to guide reporting.

No patient or public contribution: This was not relevant to the research design.

Keywords: allied health professionals; capacity building; midwifes; nurses; professional practice; research; secondment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

None declared. All authors were National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) 70@70 Senior Nurse and Midwife Research Leaders. The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Search flow.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Arksey, H. , & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: Towards a methodological framework. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 8(1), 19–32. 10.1080/1364557032000119616 - DOI
    1. Boaz, A. , Hanney, S. , Jones, T. , & Soper, B. (2015). Does the engagement of clinicians and organisations in research improve healthcare performance: A three‐stage review. BMJ Open, 5(12), e009415. 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009415 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bradbury‐Jones, C. , Aveyard, H. , Herber, O. R. , Isham, L. , Taylor, J. , & O'Malley, L. (2022). Scoping reviews: the PAGER framework for improving the quality of reporting. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 25:4, 457–470. 10.1080/13645579.2021.1899596 - DOI
    1. Bramley, L. , Manning, J. C. , & Cooper, J. (2018). Engaging and developing front‐line clinical nurses to drive care excellence: Evaluating the chief nurse excellence in care junior fellowship initiative. Journal of Research in Nursing, 23(8), 678–689. 10.1177/1744987118808843 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Carrick‐Sen, D. M. , & Moore, A. (2019). Improving care and outcome through NMAHP research‐focused clinical academic roles – An international perspective. International Journal of Practice‐Based Learning in Health and Social Care, 7(2), ii–vi. 10.18552/ijpblhsc.v7i2.648 - DOI

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources