U.S. college students' perspectives on contraception and abortion post- Dobbs: the influence of socioeconomic privilege and gender inequity
- PMID: 38269384
- PMCID: PMC10806244
- DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1274154
U.S. college students' perspectives on contraception and abortion post- Dobbs: the influence of socioeconomic privilege and gender inequity
Abstract
This study examined college students' perspectives about contraception and abortion in the context of the United States Supreme Court's decision to eliminate the constitutional right to abortion in June 2022. Individual, semi-structured interviews were conducted between October 2022 and February 2023 with a convenience sample of 20 college students, ages 18-22, attending a public university in the southeastern United States. Qualitative data analysis revealed three main themes. First, most participants conveyed fear, dismay, and anger about the decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization to overturn Roe v. Wade and a few expressed concerns about potential restrictions on contraception. Second, women participants felt heightened pressure to continue or initiate use of a highly effective contraceptive method, with some lamenting inequitable experiences of the gendered contraceptive burden in their relationships with men. Third, when asked what they would do if they or their partner became pregnant while in college, most asserted they would seek abortion. Notably, participants assumed their socioeconomic advantages would ensure their or their partner's access to abortion, regardless of growing restrictions. The findings illustrate that among a group of relatively privileged young adults, the Dobbs decision simultaneously compelled their increased vigilance regarding contraceptive use and conferred the perception that they would not be personally impacted should they need an abortion.
Keywords: United States; abortion; college students; contraception; reproductive health.
Copyright © 2024 Mann, McLennan and Broussard.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
"I am putting my fear on them subconsciously": a qualitative study of contraceptive care in the context of abortion bans in the U.S.Reprod Health. 2024 Nov 24;21(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01908-9. Reprod Health. 2024. PMID: 39581967 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in Abortion- and Contraception-Related Internet Searches After the US Supreme Court Overturned Constitutional Abortion Rights: How Much Do State Laws Matter?JAMA Health Forum. 2023 Apr 7;4(4):e230518. doi: 10.1001/jamahealthforum.2023.0518. JAMA Health Forum. 2023. PMID: 37115538 Free PMC article.
-
Use of Oral and Emergency Contraceptives After the US Supreme Court's Dobbs Decision.JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2418620. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.18620. JAMA Netw Open. 2024. PMID: 38922616 Free PMC article.
-
Public health and clinical implications of Dobbs v. Jackson for patients and healthcare providers: A scoping review.PLoS One. 2024 Mar 29;19(3):e0288947. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0288947. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38551970 Free PMC article.
-
Two years in a post- Dobbs world: clinical, social and professional consequences.Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2024 Dec 1;36(6):426-432. doi: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000000975. Epub 2024 Jul 10. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol. 2024. PMID: 39145489 Review.
References
-
- Guttmacher Institute (2023) Interactive map: US abortion policies and access after roe. Available at: https://states.guttmacher.org/policies/?_gl=1*1bx1ius*_ga*MTcwNjg1NTI3Ni....
-
- Hernandez J. (2022) Adolescents faced obstacles getting abortions. The supreme court just made it harder NPR. Available at: https://www.npr.org/2022/06/28/1108198265/adolescents-abortions-supreme-... (Accessed July 28, 2022).
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical