Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 10:11:1274154.
doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1274154. eCollection 2023.

U.S. college students' perspectives on contraception and abortion post- Dobbs: the influence of socioeconomic privilege and gender inequity

Affiliations

U.S. college students' perspectives on contraception and abortion post- Dobbs: the influence of socioeconomic privilege and gender inequity

Emily S Mann et al. Front Public Health. .

Abstract

This study examined college students' perspectives about contraception and abortion in the context of the United States Supreme Court's decision to eliminate the constitutional right to abortion in June 2022. Individual, semi-structured interviews were conducted between October 2022 and February 2023 with a convenience sample of 20 college students, ages 18-22, attending a public university in the southeastern United States. Qualitative data analysis revealed three main themes. First, most participants conveyed fear, dismay, and anger about the decision in Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health Organization to overturn Roe v. Wade and a few expressed concerns about potential restrictions on contraception. Second, women participants felt heightened pressure to continue or initiate use of a highly effective contraceptive method, with some lamenting inequitable experiences of the gendered contraceptive burden in their relationships with men. Third, when asked what they would do if they or their partner became pregnant while in college, most asserted they would seek abortion. Notably, participants assumed their socioeconomic advantages would ensure their or their partner's access to abortion, regardless of growing restrictions. The findings illustrate that among a group of relatively privileged young adults, the Dobbs decision simultaneously compelled their increased vigilance regarding contraceptive use and conferred the perception that they would not be personally impacted should they need an abortion.

Keywords: United States; abortion; college students; contraception; reproductive health.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Similar articles

References

    1. Davis MF. The state of abortion rights in the US. Int J Gynecol Obstet. (2022) 159:324–9. doi: 10.1002/ijgo.14392, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Guttmacher Institute (2023) Interactive map: US abortion policies and access after roe. Available at: https://states.guttmacher.org/policies/?_gl=1*1bx1ius*_ga*MTcwNjg1NTI3Ni....
    1. Kimport K. Abortion after Dobbs: defendants, denials, and delays. Sci Adv. (2022) 8:eade5327. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ade5327, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Foster DG. New abortion bans will increase existing health and economic disparities. Am J Public Health. (2022) 112:1276–7. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2022.306993, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hernandez J. (2022) Adolescents faced obstacles getting abortions. The supreme court just made it harder NPR. Available at: https://www.npr.org/2022/06/28/1108198265/adolescents-abortions-supreme-... (Accessed July 28, 2022).

Publication types

Substances