Cardiac resynchronization therapy for pacing induced cardiomyopathy: Role of baseline right ventricular pacing burden
- PMID: 38269497
- DOI: 10.1111/pace.14929
Cardiac resynchronization therapy for pacing induced cardiomyopathy: Role of baseline right ventricular pacing burden
Abstract
Background: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is indicated for patients with heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and chronic right ventricular (RV) pacing burden ≥40% (pacing-induced cardiomyopathy, PICM). It is uncertain whether baseline RV pacing burden impacts response to CRT.
Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of all CRT upgrades for PICM at our hospital from January 2017 to December 2018. Univariate and multivariable-adjusted changes in LVEF, and echocardiographic response (≥10% improvement in LVEF) at 3-12 months post-CRT upgrade were compared in those with RV pacing burden ≥90% versus <90%.
Results: We included 75 patients (age 74 ± 11 years, 71% male) who underwent CRT upgrade for PICM. The baseline RV pacing burden was ≥90% in 56 patients (median 99% [IQR 98%-99%]), and <90% in 19 patients (median 79% [IQR 73%-87%]). Improvement in LVEF was greater in those with baseline RV pacing burden ≥90% versus <90% (15.7 ± 9.3% vs. 7.5 ± 9.6%, p = .003). Baseline RV pacing burden ≥90% was a strong predictor of an improvement in LVEF ≥10% after CRT upgrade both in univariate and multivariate-adjusted models (p = .005 and .02, respectively).
Conclusion: A higher baseline RV pacing burden predicts a greater improvement in LVEF after CRT upgrade for PICM.
Keywords: CRT response; cardiac resynchronization therapy; chronic right ventricle pacing; heart failure; pacing-induced cardiomyopathy.
© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Noheria A, Sodhi S, Orme GJ. The evolving role of electrocardiography in cardiac resynchronization therapy. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2019;21:91. doi:10.1007/s11936-019-0784-6
-
- Andersen HR, Thuesen L, Bagger JP, Vesterlund T, Thomsen PE. Prospective randomised trial of atrial versus ventricular pacing in sick-sinus syndrome. Lancet. 1994;344:1523-1528. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(94)90347-6
-
- Nielsen JC, Kristensen L, Andersen HR, Mortensen PT, Pedersen OL, Pedersen AK. A randomized comparison of atrial and dual-chamber pacing in 177 consecutive patients with sick sinus syndrome: echocardiographic and clinical outcome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003;42:614-623. doi:10.1016/s0735-1097(03)00757-5
-
- Nielsen JC, Andersen HR, Thomsen PE, et al. Heart failure and echocardiographic changes during long-term follow-up of patients with sick sinus syndrome randomized to single-chamber atrial or ventricular pacing. Circulation. 1998;97:987-995. doi:10.1161/01.cir.97.10.987
-
- Kiehl EL, Makki T, Kumar R, et al. Incidence and predictors of right ventricular pacing-induced cardiomyopathy in patients with complete atrioventricular block and preserved left ventricular systolic function. Heart Rhythm. 2016;13:2272-2278. doi:10.1016/j.hrthm.2016.09.027
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
