Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 25:310:1086-1090.
doi: 10.3233/SHTI231132.

Matching Patients to Accelerate Clinical Trials (MPACT): Enabling Technology for Oncology Clinical Trial Workflow

Affiliations

Matching Patients to Accelerate Clinical Trials (MPACT): Enabling Technology for Oncology Clinical Trial Workflow

Nhan V Do et al. Stud Health Technol Inform. .

Abstract

Clinical trial enrollment is impeded by the significant time burden placed on research coordinators screening eligible patients. With 50,000 new cancer cases every year, the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) has made increased access for Veterans to high-quality clinical trials a priority. To aid in this effort, we worked with research coordinators to build the MPACT (Matching Patients to Accelerate Clinical Trials) platform with a goal of improving efficiency in the screening process. MPACT supports both a trial prescreening workflow and a screening workflow, employing Natural Language Processing and Data Science methods to produce reliable phenotypes of trial eligibility criteria. MPACT also has a functionality to track a patient's eligibility status over time. Qualitative feedback has been promising with users reporting a reduction in time spent on identifying eligible patients.

Keywords: Clinical trials; NLP; workflow.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Eligibility Screening.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Dashboard tracking potentially eligible patients.

References

    1. Denicoff AM, McCaskill-Stevens W, Grubbs SS, Bruinooge SS, Comis RL, Devine P, Dilts DM, Duff ME, Ford JG, Joffe S, Schapira L, Weinfurt KP, Michaels M, Raghavan D, Richmond ES, Zon R, Albrecht TL, Bookman MA, Dowlati A, Enos RA, Fouad MN, Good M, Hicks WJ, Loehrer PJ Sr, Lyss AP, Wolff SN, Wujcik DM, Meropol NJ. The National Cancer Institute-American Society of Clinical Oncology Cancer Trial Accrual Symposium: summary and recommendations. J Oncol Pract. 2013. Nov;9(6):267–76, doi: 10.1200/JOP.2013.001119. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Penberthy LT, Dahman BA, Petkov VI, DeShazo JP. Effort required in eligibility screening for clinical trials. J Oncol Pract. 2012. Nov;8(6):365–70. - PMC - PubMed
    1. von Itzstein MS, Hullings M, Mayo H, Beg MS, Williams EL, Gerber DE. Application of Information Technology to Clinical Trial Evaluation and Enrollment: A Review. JAMA Oncol. 2021. Oct;7(10):1559–66, doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Haddad T, Helgeson JM, Pomerleau KE, Preininger AM, Roebuck MC, Dankwa-Mullan I, Jackson GP, Goetz MP. Accuracy of an Artificial Intelligence System for Cancer Clinical Trial Eligibility Screening: Retrospective Pilot Study. JMIR Med Inform. 2021. Mar;9(3):e27767, doi: 10.2196/27767. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beck JT, Rammage M, Jackson GP, Preininger AM, Dankwa-Mullan I, Roebuck MC, Torres A, Holtzen H, Coverdill SE, Williamson MP, Chau Q, Rhee K, Vinegra M. Artificial Intelligence Tool for Optimizing Eligibility Screening for Clinical Trials in a Large Community Cancer Center. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. 2020. Jan;4:50–9, doi: 10.1200/CCI.19.00079. - DOI - PubMed