Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2024 Jan 26;24(1):19.
doi: 10.1186/s12873-024-00938-7.

Acute care pathway assessed through performance indicators during the COVID-19 pandemic in OECD countries (2020-2021): a scoping review

Affiliations

Acute care pathway assessed through performance indicators during the COVID-19 pandemic in OECD countries (2020-2021): a scoping review

Ana Sofia V Carvalho et al. BMC Emerg Med. .

Abstract

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic severely impacted care for non-COVID patients. Performance indicators to monitor acute care, timely reported and internationally accepted, lacked during the pandemic in OECD countries. This study aims to summarize the performance indicators available in the literature to monitor changes in the quality of acute care in OECD countries during the first year and a half of the pandemic (2020-July 2021) and to assess their trends.

Methods: Scoping review. Search in Embase and MEDLINE (07-07-2022). Acute care performance indicators and indicators related to acute general surgery were collected and collated following a care pathway approach. Indicators assessing identical clinical measures were grouped under a common indicator title. The trends from each group of indicators were collated (increase/decrease/stable).

Results: A total of 152 studies were included. 2354 indicators regarding general acute care and 301 indicators related to acute general surgery were included. Indicators focusing on pre-hospital services reported a decreasing trend in the volume of patients: from 225 indicators, 110 (49%) reported a decrease. An increasing trend in pre-hospital treatment times was reported by most of the indicators (n = 41;70%) and a decreasing trend in survival rates of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (n = 61;75%). Concerning care provided in the emergency department, most of the indicators (n = 752;71%) showed a decreasing trend in admissions across all levels of urgency. Concerning the mortality rate after admission, most of the indicators (n = 23;53%) reported an increasing trend. The subset of indicators assessing acute general surgery showed a decreasing trend in the volume of patients (n = 50;49%), stability in clinical severity at admission (n = 36;53%), and in the volume of surgeries (n = 14;47%). Most of the indicators (n = 28;65%) reported no change in treatment approach and stable mortality rate (n = 11,69%).

Conclusion: This review signals relevant disruptions across the acute care pathway. A subset of general surgery performance indicators showed stability in most of the phases of the care pathway. These results highlight the relevance of assessing this care pathway more regularly and systematically across different clinical entities to monitor disruptions and to improve the resilience of emergency services during a crisis.

Keywords: Acute care; COVID-19; Continuity of patient care; Emergency Service; Emergency department; Health care [MeSH]; Hospital [MeSH]; Quality indicators; Quality of health care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flow diagram—literature search (17th March, 14th December 2021 and 07th July 2022). From: Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Group of general acute healthcare indicators and their respective trends: OECD countries (2020 – July 2021)
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Groups of acute general surgery indicators and their respective trends: OECD countries (2020 – July 2021)

Similar articles

References

    1. World Health Organization. A year without precedent: WHO’s COVID-19 response. 2020 [cited 2023 Feb 2]. Available from: https://reliefweb.int/report/world/year-without-precedent-who-s-covid-19....
    1. World Health Organization: Geneva. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on noncommunicable disease resources and services: results of a rapid assessment. 2020.
    1. Committee for the Coordination of Statistical activities. How COVID-19 is changing the world: a statistical perspective, Volume III. 2021 [cited 2023 Feb 2]. Available from: https://data.unicef.org/resources/how-covid-19-is-changing-the-world-a-s....
    1. World Health Organization. Rapid assessment of service delivery for NCDs during the COVID-19 pandemic. 2020 [cited 2023 Feb 2]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/m/item/rapid-assessment-of-service-deli....
    1. OECD. Flattening the COVID-19 peak: Containment and mitigation policies. Tackling coronavirus (COVID-19)- Policy responses. 2020 [cited 2023 Feb 2]. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/coronavirus/policy-responses/flattening-the-covid-1....

Publication types